That W.
Rude Staff
Rude Staff. They don't put in any effort to resolve issues, I had to spend hours trying to get one random country criminal background check to come back, even though I have no record. They held up my start date.

HireRight is a leading global provider of technology-driven workforce risk management and compliance solutions. We provide comprehensive background screening, verification, identification, monitoring, and drug and health screening services for approximately 38,000 customers across the globe. We offer our services via a unified global software and data platform that tightly integrates into our customers’ human capital management systems enabling highly effective and efficient workflows for workforce hiring, onboarding, and monitoring. In 2022, we screened over 24 million job applicants, employees and contractors for our customers and processed over 107 million screens. For more information, visit www.HireRight.com.
HireRight (hireright.com) has 757 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 1.1 out of 5.
Is this your business?
Correct your details and reply to customers in public. Both are free.
Claim this listing757 approved reviews, newest moderated first
That W.
Rude Staff. They don't put in any effort to resolve issues, I had to spend hours trying to get one random country criminal background check to come back, even though I have no record. They held up my start date.
Rabel P.
This company is a horrible service company. They make you go back and forth for information and delay your process to be hired. They expect you to do all their work, they literally get paid to ask you for all the documents they need to do their own research for. They make you go through hell and never have completed information.
Krunal
Very unprofessional service by HireRight. I don’t understand why companies are still using their services after all the applicants bashing out their frustrations out there. They don’t care for your time. For every single information they waste 48 hours, if weekend comes that it goes to 96 hours to someone work on the request. They don’t bother to check all the information provided before updating the case and after they made the update they won’t check again for 24 hours ! It’s horrible out there. I feel lost and helpless.
SH
My experience with HireRight has been disappointing. The screening process takes an excessive amount of time, with very limited transparency about what is actually happening. You receive little insight into the status of the checks or why additional documentation is being requested. I was also asked multiple times to provide information that I had already submitted earlier in the process. This repetition makes the process feel disorganized and unnecessarily prolonged. What stood out most is the lack of contextual judgment. In my case, this concerned a graduate intern position. Nevertheless, the process felt like a generic checklist being applied without considering whether certain requests were proportionate or relevant to the role, like boarding passes to prove I travelled during a gap year. There seems to be no distinction between screening an intern and screening for a senior, high-risk position. Overall, the process feels rigid, inefficient, and poorly tailored to individual circumstances.
AD
My case was handled in the most unprofessional and horrible way by HireRight. I'm mentioning a few examples here - 1) My background verification case was returned to me for clarification because I had mentioned the name of one of my technical certification as "ABCD-Enterprise" and the background checker found the certification is called "ABCD Enterprise". The only difference was a hyphen/dash "-". Can you imagine?!! 2) The background checker was asking for clarifications and sending this case back to me multiple times for the same document which could have been asked at the same time instead of sending this case back and forth multiple times. For example, when I was contracting through the agency called "ABC XYZ Talent", first I was asked to provide the lastest copy of the contract and later I was asked again to provide the first copy of the contract, which could have been asked altogether at the same time, to reduce the waste of time by sending this case back and forth!! 3) I was asked to provide the details of when someone will be present at an address where I lived more than 15 years ago!! That was more than 15 years ago and I was renting that place and have no details of the person anymore from whom I was renting. I don't even know if the same person still owns that place or not? I would have liked to know, the person who asked for this information from me, if they themselves know all the details of where they were living more than 15 years ago!! 4) Also, after a certain instance of sending my case back and forth, I was no longer getting notification emails when my case was assigned back to me requesting clarifications or documents. So there was no way for me to know if my case was sitting idle on me to provide the details they were looking for. Who would have so much time in their hand to login to HireRight portal once every hour to check if the case is assigned to me looking for some information? I feel this was done deliberately from their end to purposefully delay the case citing the reason that the candidate has delayed in producing the requested information. This is one of the worst ways to operate, shame on HireRight! If this is the quality of background verification by HireRight, then I have to say that this is one of the worst background verification company that I have ever come accross in my entire career. I wonder how they continue to keep customers and clients with such horrible quality of service!
Lena
My experience with HireRight has been frustrating due to poor communication and a baffling 30-day delay in reporting a lost specimen. I completed all requirements by January 15, yet I was only notified on February 19 that my initial drug test sample was missing. It is difficult to understand how a specimen can be "lost" for an entire month without the candidate being notified, especially when I was told on Feb 13 that the process was "automated" and nearly finished. This lack of transparency forced my employer to postpone my start date three times. While the customer support team is accessible via chat, they were unable to provide any concrete ETAs or identify the missing specimen issue until it was far too late. I recommend that future candidates stay extremely persistent in following up, as the system's "Completed" status may not reflect the actual state of your requirements.
Joseph M.
I’ve had an extremely frustrating experience with HireRight. Despite being a background check company with the ability to access verification services through the Social Security Administration and IRS (services they could pay for and automate), they instead push the burden entirely onto the candidate. I’ve received over 40+ emails, often one per day, each asking for another document or clarification. Most recently, they demanded historical W-2 forms — something many people simply don’t keep indefinitely. Rather than using modern verification methods, they rely on manual, piecemeal requests that create unnecessary delays and stress. At this point, I view HireRight as poorly designed, under-automated, and overly dependent on candidates doing their internal work for them. Frankly, going forward, if a company tells me they use HireRight, I will strongly reconsider working with that company. This has been one of the worst onboarding-related experiences I’ve encountered.
GM
My background screening with HireRight lasted over six weeks and caused serious professional and financial disruption. I provided documentation promptly and repeatedly. Despite this, the process stalled with conflicting status updates, poor communication, and no meaningful explanation of timelines. Information was marked incomplete even though supporting materials were submitted. There was no clear escalation path, no ownership of the delay, and no transparency about what was actually happening behind the scenes. When employment is contingent on these reports, delays like this directly impact candidates’ income, health, and career momentum. Background screening companies are gatekeepers to people’s livelihoods. The lack of accountability in this process was alarming. I sincerely hope employers reconsider using vendors that cannot provide accurate, timely, and transparent verification services. The cost of these failures is carried entirely by candidates.