weissratings.comReviews of weissratings.com

Plagiarized a month old FUD article about Nano and passed it off as their own!

Their research on certain projects was not objective but rather biased. Also no links or data to back up on their claims. Poorly executed ratings.

I was waiting for concrete reviews, but all I got was biased opinions formed in 3 days of research. EDIT: Even worse, it was pure plagiarism of a month old article!

The ratings, as one might call them, are based on subjective impressions of individuals without the ability to comprehend the evaluated mentally. I can strongly advise against any contact with these individuals.

Bordering on a fraudulent enterprise because evidence of their claimed objectivity and thoroughness is non-existent. No references, no arguments to their analyses. Language designed to evoke emotional responses discouraging further research from the reader. Obviously biased for unknown reasons – deeply worrying.

Weiss Ratings -- A very incapable info provider, especially in the cryptocurrency industry. If people want to learn something about cryptocurrency, try to learn it from some reputable figures. Weiss Ratings has zero credibility in crypto space as we all know.

Crypto reviews are completely unresearched and assesed by non-technical writers. Blatant misinformation should be removed and Weiss should be ashamed.

Their cryptocurrency reviews are sub par. It appears they don’t understand the technology or take the time necessary to fully understand it. For example, with nano currency, they posted an article today that was completely flawed. In fact, it was so flawed that it’s evident a review was completed with minimal to no research involved. Nano is one of the most secure cryptocurrency networks to date, instant, scalable and decentralized. The article written by Weiss says it is neither decentralized (not true) and double spends are possible which would make the network not secure (outrageously completely not true). I won’t sit here and pick apart every piece of information, but seriously I would have no problem with actual pros and cons being listed. This article is just complete rubbish. And it’s not just with nano, it seems like there are many coins out there they review with no research to push out rubbish articles just to fluff their monetized content. Weiss ratings, you should be ashamed.