Bruce S.
Stay away from this company especially…
Stay away from this company especially if you are a beginner. Their so called great customer service is no good. Specific questions are answered with canned answers.

In Business Since 1971, Weiss Ratings empowers millions of investors with ratings, research and newsletters that provide the highest accuracy, the best safety and the most profitable investment guidance.Each day of the year, we issue over 52,000 newly updated ratings, including investment ratings on nearly all U.S.-listed stocks, mutual funds and ETFs; safety ratings on nearly all U.S. banks, credit unions and insurance companies; plus cryptocurrency ratings on most actively traded digital assets.Based on this vast array of ratings and research, our newsletters guide subscribers to investments and strategies with the goal of preserving and growing their wealth with confidence.
weissratings.com (weissratings.com) has 730 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 4.2 out of 5.
Is this your business?
Correct your details and reply to customers in public. Both are free.
Claim this listing
Investments & Wealth · Hollywood, Florida
Excellent

Investments & Wealth · Orlando, Florida
Excellent

Investments & Wealth · Ponte Vedra, Florida
Excellent
Investments & Wealth · BOYNTON BEACH, Florida
Excellent
730 approved reviews, newest moderated first
Bruce S.
Stay away from this company especially if you are a beginner. Their so called great customer service is no good. Specific questions are answered with canned answers.
Christopher G.
i bought Weiss Ratings Marijuana Millionaire last May. A complete and total RIPOFF! Almost every pick has been a loser and this way before the market crash. This service was $2500.00 a year and Martin Weiss and Sean Broderick were claiming INCREDIBLE RETURNS. I asked for my money back and was only offered another service. Don't walk away from this service. RUN!
Consumer
I also got scammed by believing Weiss. I am another who bought & paid for "lifetime" subscriptions to newsletters from four of their writers. I paid the large upfront fee because I wanted to follow those particular analyst/writers. But after a few years they transferred my subscriptions to newsletters from Banyan Hill. I had no choice in this, and find very little value in the simplistic Banyan Hill subscriptions. It's not like Weiss sold out or lost their analysts... who still write the same basic newsletters at Weiss. This is less about the value of any subscriptions and more about basic honesty. Dr. Weiss and his people are clearly not interested in keeping their word or promises. Proven scammers.
Ilda M.
The Weiss refund policy on their main website is not the same policy hidden in the terms and conditions when you place an order. This is a misleading way to have the consumer believe that the purchase is refundable for the unused portion of the subscription when in fact you do not get a refund for the first year. The first year is not refundable and this is hidden on purpose in complete contradiction with the refund policy on their main website landing page. In my opinion, this practice borders on being very close to; CONSUMER FRAUD.
Baba A.
I do not think copying other authors' articles is worth anything..
Michio K.
These rankings were clearly uninformed and underwhelming. Zero credibility with the crypto community
Albin
I am very interested in cryptocurrencies, not because it's price but because of its actual technology. Now when I hear that Weiss is going to review Nano I like everybody else gets super excited... But after reading the review the feeling of disgust came even faster. Their review didn't once contain actual facts and the amount of false claims was outrageous
Benjamin N.
The rating of the Nano token was complete bull crap. You could google search, word-for-word the article that Weiss ratings "published" and you would find matching articles on different websites before the article went live on the weisscrypto website. When weisscrypto presented "proof" that they published the article on their website before other websites (trybe, medium, etc.), the proof came in the form of a PDF file. And the meta data showed that the PDF was published on July 27th 2019. Previously published articles on different websites were July 12th and even June 20th of 2019. In the end their proof neither proved nor disproved their plagiarism of another article.