Mark & C.
Another very profitable (expensive) boutique dog food
Latest venture capital run; 53 million for fully remote company with small corporate office in Cleveland. Unnamed "team members", "experts", and "partners" across the US. Do not be fooled by wife (DVM)/husband(engineer) pet parents/founders "made by parents for parents....we just wanted to find something healthy for our pet" feel good. BIG money to be made in boutique pet food market as evidenced by proliferation of brands with online marketing. Some unnamed contracted USDA-monitored kitchen uses USDA minimum time/temp kill in proprietary air-dry process to make jerky like pieces rather than similar low temp extruded kibble. ALOT of that 72 oz bag ends up being crumbs! They do say Midwest Labs hired to test lots (lot # is stamped on bag at least). Website has no link for customers to post reviews. Truly independent sites like this have a disproportionate number of poor reviews. Vet founder still using unsupported and retracted FDA legume-DCM/allergy scare from years ago to promote her 3yr/17 formulation try for just 3 recipes. Similar language to try to paint ALL kibble as synthetic/poor nutrition/low quality and ALL fresh/frozen as expensive/thaw-prep/messy/storage. Apparent that contracted teams for customer service, order processing, and marketing do their own thing. What website says, what customer service rep says, and what actually transpires trial order to automatic subscription plan are NOT the same. Cost per day for my 110# 11 yo malador $10.18 vs $3.41 Champion Orijen kibble from local pet store. IF one trusts unnamed kitchens in Ohio and Nebraska and quality/testing claims, Sundays is really attractive due to 83-91% muscle/organ content and relatively low carb ratio. The only reason they got a test drive from me was my dismay that MARS bought out Champions investor group. That, along with other boutique brand buyouts (ie blue buffalo) goes to say how ludicrous the boutique pet food business is. Trustpilot System (Trustpilot Content Integrity) 23 Jan 2025, 14:32 GMT Hi again, We’re just following up about your review of sundaysfordogs.com, which was flagged for containing defamatory content. The decision Good news — we’ve assessed the content flagged by the business, and determined that it’s not defamatory. Therefore, we’ve put your review back online.Trustpilot advises that this was reviewed for defamatory Apparent that their marketing contractor is watching. Wonder if founders read. Wonder if Dr (DVM) Tory Waxman approved ads with "aging backwards" content.



