Saptak G.
Long term review
I was one of the early subscribers (dating back to the SmartyStocks name in 2021). Initially, I followed the high-conviction and number 1 stock picks recommended by the service, including stocks like Desktop Metals, Farfetch, Canopy Growth, Beyond Meat, Chegg, and Plug Power. The portfolio performance was extremely disappointing; these speculative stocks have since suffered near-total losses or company failures. I have since shifted my portfolio to large-cap stocks and diversified ETFs, a strategy that has delivered significantly better, more reliable returns than following this advisory service.
Response from www.moby.coDec 5, 2025
Hi — thank you for being an early subscriber and for laying out your experience so clearly. I’m sorry the outcome felt disappointing for you. I also want to respond directly to a few important points in your review for accuracy and context. First, we’ve never presented our high-conviction picks as “safe” or guaranteed winners, especially during the 2021–2022 period you reference, when markets were unusually speculative and growth-heavy. Those reports were explicitly framed as higher-risk, higher-volatility ideas alongside clear risk language. Many stocks in innovative or early-stage sectors did experience severe drawdowns across the entire market as rates rose, liquidity tightened, and investor appetite shifted — that wasn’t unique to Moby or to our research. Second, it’s important to separate disagreeing with a thesis in hindsight from implying bad faith. We publish our reasoning, sources, and valuation logic transparently at the time we write. Some theses play out; some don’t — that is the reality of equity research, especially in newer or emerging industries. We won’t rewrite history to pretend every call was perfect, but we also won’t accept the framing that unfavorable outcomes automatically mean irresponsibility or deception. Third, your shift to large-caps and diversified ETFs is a totally reasonable strategy — and one we frequently discuss as a core approach for many investors, depending on risk tolerance and time horizon. Our research is designed to offer informed opportunities, not to dictate a one-size-fits-all portfolio. If a subscriber chooses to allocate heavily to speculative names without diversification, that’s a portfolio decision, not something we instruct or require. Finally, the product has evolved meaningfully since the SmartyStocks era. We’ve broadened coverage, improved methodology, and expanded our focus to include a wider mix of risk profiles and market environments. We continuously refine how we communicate risk, scenario outcomes, and portfolio construction so readers can calibrate ideas appropriately. We appreciate you sticking with us early on, and we’re genuinely sorry these picks didn’t work out for you. If you’d like, email us and we’re happy to pull up the specific reports you’re referencing and walk through the original theses and what changed — not to argue, but to be transparent and helpful. Wishing you continued success with your current strategy, and thanks again for the candid feedback.




