Nate A.
Worth it
The amount of bad reviews here kinda blows my mind, and is kind of indicative of how little most people know about the legal system. All FairShake really does Is provides an easy place for consumers to pursue the legal mechanisms available though their contracts with some notable companies. They know what clauses are typical for each industry, and as such have largely automated a clerical process that can be overwhelming for some consumers. My case was with Comcast, which was the company that the Wall Street Journal article about FairShake focused on. Comcast actually lobbied Congress a few years back to try and argue that they were right to strongarm consumers into signing contracts preventing them from suing Comcast because arbitration was a sufficient legal safeguard. This, in my opinion, is incredibly stupid because arbitration typically costs several hundred dollars, and as the WSJ article points out, the average settlement with Comcast is less than $700. Comcast was literally betting on consumers giving up on getting their money back through a bunch of red tape. FairShake is a company that helps consumers call their bluff. I only contacted FairShake after a dozen or so failed attempts to contact Comcast. I simply told FairShake what I was trying to tell Comcast. FairShake threatened arbitration, and in the interest of avoiding arbitration they refunded me the $184 I was asking for, and even in looking deeper into my previous account the realized they had made a mistake on that account as well, refunding me a total of $270. This all happened without having to go to arbitration, and without me having to spend hours scouring my Comcast contract to see what legal rights I had as a consumer. This was well worth the $20 I ended up paying to FairShake.


