Had to pick one star because there was not an option of no stars …..since my damage from hurricane Helene universal property insurance company has stagnated, interfered, and ultimately left my house half repaired..considering the outside A-frame siding to my house as well as soffit to be “cosmetic”and not covered….. please please please steer clear from this insurance company. They will not come through for you. They were they will undervalue any claim you try to submit.
Response from Universal Property & Casualty InsuranceJan 5, 2026
Due to your claim being represented by a third party we are unable to comment on this review at this time.
KP
Kim P.
Go elsewhere!!!
Wrote a new policy, paid in full and got cancellation notice 45 days later with less than 2 weeks! Sited age of roof as they could not find permit past original in 1991! I submitted seller disclosure with date of roof but they said unlikely they will accept it. policy #4201-2501-4189.
If it was a concern this should have happened upfront as it just did with another property. Now mid December and having to deal with this! What if I was away?! Permit is not required for roof... Just terrible experience!!
Response from Universal Property & Casualty InsuranceDec 9, 2025
Thank you for your feedback and allowing us the opportunity to respond. We are sorry hear this was a frustrating experience. UPCIC manages its risk according to the underwriting guidelines, and once a policy is bound it enters a 90-day underwriting period. During this time the company reviews the property information to confirm the risk meets those guidelines.
In your case, the roof did not meet the underwriting standards required for the policy to continue. We know this outcome was disappointing, and we appreciate you sharing your perspective.
KE
krystal E.
Very unprofessional
Very unprofessional. They dropped my insurance and I provided them with EVERYTHING THEY REQUESTED!!!
Response from Universal Property & Casualty InsuranceNov 20, 2025
We are unable to locate your file by the name on this review. Please send this review and your policy number to [email protected] so we may address your concerns.
JH
J. H.
Great Service
I usually find it challenging to address my concerns when calling customer service, but yesterday’s experience was different. I spoke with Steve, and his service was outstanding from start to finish! He was friendly, attentive, and went above and beyond to offer additional support for my issue. I’m really grateful for the excellent experience he provided.
Response from Universal Property & Casualty InsuranceNov 7, 2025
Thank you for the kind words and for recognizing Steve's efforts! We will be sure to pass this review along and congratulate him on a job well done!
DC
Darren C.
Avoid if you have a dog
Hiked premium 3x within months of starting policy due to what they deemed to be an aggressive breed of dog without inquiring about bite history or anything promptly cancelled it’s a total ripoff! Even little ankle bitters make this list just an FYI
Response from Universal Property & Casualty InsuranceOct 28, 2025
We understand you are upset but UPCIC has underwriting guidelines that must be met. UPCIC does accept dogs. But certain breeds are unacceptable. The dog list has been a part of the underwriting guidelines for many years. The list was carefully researched and contains what is considered aggressive dog breeds. The list of these breeds is there to protect people not hurt them. The guidelines do not consider bite history for a specific dog but rather the breed as a whole. We understand you are upset and know the relationship between a policyholder and their dogs or pets in general can be very special. So, again we understand you being upset but we do hope you reconsider and remove this review as UPCIC is only following its guidelines. We would like to look into this further to verify your policy. Please email us your policy number to [email protected] so we may review your current policy. Thank you
BA
Barbara
Bought homeowners and umbrella…
Bought homeowners and umbrella insurance from Universal thru a local Tampa insurance broker. When sold the house, Universal refunded remaining insurance premium fairly quickly, no problems.
Response from Universal Property & Casualty InsuranceOct 14, 2025
Thank you! We are happy to hear you were satisfied with the service we provided!
AO
a O.
Deceitful business practice
I have serious concern with the handling of my claim #FL25-0122085. No in-person inspection was ever conducted of either my unit or the unit of origin, despite the clear relevance of the latter to causation. On a recorded call, the adjuster even stated it was “in my best interest” for him not to visit my property — a remark wholly inappropriate and inconsistent with any fair or impartial investigation.
As a former human rights fact-finder, I know firsthand that direct observation is essential to credibility. By failing to inspect, he deprived himself of critical evidence and rendered his investigation incomplete and potentially biased. This deficiency appears to have contributed directly to the denial of my claim.
Such conduct violates Florida Statutes §626.9541(1)(i)3.d and §626.877, which mandate thorough investigations based on all available information.
Further, the conclusion that this was merely a “sudden, accidental occurrence” rather than negligence is unsupported by the record:
• Neither the property owner nor the management company conducted any inspection, and tenants are not professionally qualified to assess causation.
• Tenant correspondence, sent four days after the incident, shows they were still waiting for management to even respond.
• The adjuster conducted no inspection himself, depriving the investigation of firsthand evidence.
• Former tenants have provided statements confirming that the issues were ongoing, worsened over time, and ultimately drove them to move out.
• The unit above has a documented history of multiple prior leaks, pointing to a longstanding pattern of inadequate maintenance by the owner.
These facts suggest that negligent property oversight contributed to the incident and should have been considered before denying coverage. It raises serious concerns that my denial may have been predetermined rather than the product of a genuine, thorough investigation.
Response from Universal Property & Casualty InsuranceAug 18, 2025
We are committed to providing exemplary service to our insureds. We invite you to contact us at [email protected] so that we may discuss this matter, explain why your claims in this review do not align with the facts as presented to us, and see if there is anything further that we can do to be of assistance to you in this matter. We look forward to connecting with you soon.
FJ
Floramae J.
Again the worst insurance company
Subject: Policy Cancellation Due to Poor Claim Handling Experience.
Dear Universal Property & Causality Insurance,
I am writing because of your response.
The lack of clear and consistent communication during my recent claim process. Throughout the handling of a single claim, I was assigned three different claims adjusters, which resulted in confusion, delays, and a lack of continuity in service.
To make matters worse, during this time my family and I were forced to pay out of pocket for temporary housing while repairs were underway. All relevant receipts for the hotel stay, as well as thorough documentation of the work completed on the property — including before and after photos — were submitted promptly for reimbursement. Despite this, the process remained slow and disorganized, with no timely response or resolution provided.
Given the importance of reliable and responsive service in times of need, I can no longer place my trust in your company to provide the level of support expected from a property insurance provider.
This is why I cancel my policy with your company. So please don't get on here and tell lies.
Response from Universal Property & Casualty InsuranceAug 11, 2025
We are sorry to hear your experience did not meet your expectations. The process and length for a claim can vary depending on the claim. Each is its own. If there were any mishaps in communication on our end, we will hold ourselves accountable. Based on the notes it appears there were calls in and out from all parties including yourself and the contractor.
Your first coverage payment on this claim was made two days after the claim was submitted. Four additional coverage payments made over the next four months to close out the claim. The first loss of use (Hotel stay) was made nine days after the claim was filed. That payment was made once we received receipts. Two more loss of use drafts issued six days later. In total there were five loss of use drafts issued and cleared. Based on the file notes the communication with yourself, the contractor and other parties appear to be consistent. If we did not meet your expectations, then we apologize and will use that feedback to improve our process. We wish you well.