Julianna V.
MONOPRICE has patent infringement suits
MONOPRICE has had to deal with patent infringement suits since AJAY KUMAR became chief of the company. The first suit was settled out of court and the second suit is pending. KUMAR will not answer any questions regarding what countries in Asia are making copycats of high-end speaker systems, and high-end microphone systems and other high-end products. These products are exact copy cats of products made in the united states. KUMAR has the companies in these countries, whether it’s India or China, sign a disclaimer stating that MONOPRICE will not be held liable for any copyright infringement‘s these “Asian“ companies partake in. It’s like a balloon with no hot air. They cannot be enforced. It’s a business model based on patent infringement on high-end products where these products are made as copycats of products made in the United States, But because they are made somewhere in China and/or India they cost as much as 30 to 35% less. Actually when you know the truth, it’s a disgrace. I did extensive research on MONOPRICE after I purchased a high-end Bluetooth noise canceling headset and MONOOPRICE sent it to an address that I lived at three years ago and I have no idea whatsoever who’s living there now. The last seven purchases I made from MONOPRICE were sent to my current address. But the customer service agents I talked to at MONOPRICE on the two occasions I called them told me that they would have a supervisor call me back that same day. That never happened. Eventually a supervisor did contact me and thought it would be a good idea if I wrote to my old address to see if the headset had been delivered. What an absurd option I thought to myself. I’m supposed to send a letter addressed to “occupant” and expect the residents who live there to do anything but throw it in the trash. So I told a MONOPRICE supervisor that I would be filing a complaint with PayPal requesting a charge back and then I would also be contacting the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce revealing to that agency all that I learned about MONOPRICE‘s patent infringement suits and their widespread practice of precisely duplicating high-end products made in the United States, but having it done in some Asian countries where the labor is cheap and MONOPRICE can pass that onto the consumer at a price of 30 to 35% less. All I can say to you, Mr. Kumar, is “shame on you” for coming up with this highly unethical business model. MONOPRICE is not the company it used to be and I have just explained why. Under my serious threats MONOPRICE finally refunded my purchase price for the headset. In response to the canned response to my review, whether Mr. KUMAR still heads MONOPRICE or not, his business model is still used by the company. Why? Because it creates a large portion of the company’s profits. KUMAR may have left, but his business model has not. And one has to ask why Mr. KUMAR left Monoprice. Could it have something to do with the patent infringement suits? Read the article by CNET. Go to the CNET site and search for MONOPRICE. I tried to put a link to the article but Trustpilot does not allow this - not sure why, but it is their policy and I respect that. And this response by MONOPRICE is their canned response to every criticism of the company. look at the responses yourself. They’re all basically the same. I’m just glad that I was able to finally, after jumping through seemingly endless hoops and getting no response from supervisors after being told that they would call back the same day but didn’t call back for several days. Monoprice is still using the same business model laid out in the article by CNET.
Response from MonopriceNov 28, 2022
Hello Julianna, I apologize you've had an unpleasant experience with us. Please contact me at [email protected] to assist you with your concerns. Mr Kumar has not worked with or for Monoprice for over 8 years. I am happy to assist you with any current issues you would like resolved. I look forward to hearing from you. Regards, Laura P. Customer Service Manager



