DataMaster for AppraisersReviews of datamasterusa.com

I had a problem uploading condo data to my software. Repeated calls did not solve the problem. The day I asked for, and I believe his name is Rick, the president, the problem was solved in a few hours. So I had to ask for the boss to get anything done. The problem was fixed and we are happy. However, I have started doing the desktop appraisals for Wells Fargo which is a new form. After inquiring for over six months I just stopped asking if DataMaster was going to include this in the product lineup. I asked several times if this new form was going to be made available and have never received any kind of answer. I really do like the product and it has saved me time. The vast majority of the time DataMaster makes my life easier. Like any new company it appears growing pains are taking their toll. I do have faith that these issues will get resolved. Thank you all.

The product works and that's key. My issue is the cost, for what I pay, regression analysis should be included. There are similar programs that are cheaper that now integrate better than before. My key issue that has held me from switching is that I'm waiting to see if Data Master will offer some regression tools to this wonderful program.

I was promised years ago when I signed up that northern Kentucky mls would be added. still nothing

The product is user-friendly, however, it is expensive for a data importer.

too much inaccurate information being inputted into my appraisals through DataMaster. Info from my MLS and public records source are not consistent with DataMasters sources. Very frustrating and causing me more work.

Great product. Outstanding help

2055 and 1025 data transfer falls short of expectations. The URAR performs fairly well.

I've called twice about problems with the way the MLS information transfers to my ACI and both times it was not helpful. Data master does not input in some of the UAD format on the grid, such as site size includes a comma (UAD format does not allow commas) and the "Effective Date of Data Source" does not include a zero for months 01 to 09. Along with a few other items, that I have to immediately fix. It would also be nice if you included the cost approach like Spark does. To be honest, once Spark is available to ACI users I may switch over. Its not only less per month but includes the cost approach.