CrossoverReviews of crossover.com

to begin with, they are in breach of GDPR (EU and UK data protection) they do not allow the right to be forgotten, or at least they hide it well. They wanted to management consultant for 100k, but the questions came across as a telesales, they did not require any management consultant experience in their selection process. But a 2 years in telecommunication and that was the key requirement....not the industry experience. Just seem sketchy. Trying to remove my data or even correct it, they get server errors. the website seems very basic and has glitches. I really am dissatisfied with the service. I would avoid.

I was selected by Crossover last year and I have been working there since. I failed the test once and got selected on my second try. There is very less job security because you are competing with the top 1% best talent in the world. Just because you were not selected does not mean the company is not legit. If you gave up means you could have never made it through training in this company. I love working there because it challenges me to give my best every day I log in to work. I look forward to excelling in the current role and try for the next level. There is no consideration that you work there when applying for another role. Everyone has a fair chance at being selected. I hope to work there until my contract lasts.

Automated tests disqualify based on tests lacking certification, depth or any sort of practical implications. No serious company should engage with their product at this level of maturity (or lack thereof).

Ridiculous system. Requires you to complete a questionnaire which disqualifies you if you leave the window to prevent cheating. However, I had a chrome update popup appear halfway through and was disqualified. This isn't something I could have predicted or prevented. Appalling UX. Why would any company use this service?

Having applied to a number of roles advertised by Crossover.com, I find their refusal to allow a candidate to apply for multiple advertised roles concurrently insane. It means they could reject the best candidate, not because they are unsuitable, but because they have applied for another role that they suitable for as well! By their approach, a candidate could only apply for maybe 10 roles a year! A very unsatisfactory approach that is detrimental to the hiring company and candidates alike - I recommend avoiding like mad. They also have a personal email address of the recruiter which then bounces - so very unprofessional. One recruiter to avoid as there are a few good ones out there, and this is at the other end of the spectrum.

Prices are through the roof can live with that and dev we got is from Ukraine, so there was a good 10 hour gap in communication.

PROS The projects are good and challenging (also the payment) CONS The management, intrusion software and unrealistic expectations are not so good...

Amerikansk "test" side