George
The consultation (second opinion) I…
The consultation (second opinion) I received did not shed much light on my dog’s condition from what I already knew from my own research or from our primary veterinarian who suggested this referral. Moreover, two previous veterinarians failed to make a correct diagnosis which in the end delayed treatment for our dog. The consultation was expensive $277 given the complexity (not complex) of the issue being consulted on plus additional x-rays with a final bill over $800. I have found that there is not much difference in these specialty clinics. The paradigm for treatment is the same and suggests a “group think” mentality without any creativity, innovation or intellectual curiosity in investigating repurposed drugs. I wonder how many veterinarians actually engage in continuing education to offer patients an alternative to the standard of care: cut it out, radiation and chemo poison. It’s a battle between the somatic mutation theory vs the metabolic disease theory of cancer. Not impressed with either the human or veterinarian medicine available nowadays. Our dog is being treated outside of expected protocols and despite the delay in treatment she is making steady process and we are optimistic she might be able to beat this. Perhaps others have found success with these specialty clinics for their pets, but we have not given our timeline that spans over 6 months of inadequate investigative examination and care to arrive at a proper diagnoses given her breed, age and propensity for cancer. It would have been helpful had this been brought to our attention earlier so preventive screenings could have been performed.


