Dan
It's a gamble
Considering that the subscription tiers are based on word counts, I would hesitate to subscribe. The intent behind some of our creations is not conveyed via the software. So, it would be common for thousands of words that did not provide value to be subtracted from the monthly allowance. Unless the monthly subscription was very reasonably priced and offered unlimited usage, we would not subscribe, even while we appreciate what the software is capable of. Re: Jounce's reply... It's perfectly fine that you respectfully disagree. You requested, via email, that I submit an honest review and that is what I did. I am the potential customer who has experienced certain results with your product. Based on my experience, despite your disagreement, my viewpoint remains unchanged. Furthermore, multiple users is not something I place value on, considering my needs. I would not pay $39 monthly to get more of what has been experienced up to this point. That's a fact that you cannot disagree with. Good luck 🙂
Response from JounceApr 18, 2023
Hi Dan, we're going to have to respectfully disagree with your review. You can get 200,000 monthly words for only $39 a month with no additional cost for extra users. However you can get 20,000 for only $9. Almost no users use more than this monthly. Our pricing model is intrinsically linked to the computational resources consumed, which inevitably escalate with higher usage. Those solutions claiming to provide unlimited words often impose daily restrictions, limit accounts to a single user, or compromise the quality of AI-generated content to counterbalance the "unlimited words" feature. At Jounce, we consistently prioritize delivering exceptional quality over sheer quantity.