Gary H.
Pre-dispatch price hikes, significant damage on delivery, and a retroactive insurance demand
We contracted International Van Lines for a door-to-door international household move from Texas to the UK. The initial contract was based on a remote video (virtual) survey of the house. The contract price rose twice before dispatch: from the January 2024 estimate of $18,281 to $23,975 at booking on 1 August 2024 (a 31% increase), and then to $33,968 only three weeks later (a further 42%), when — with packing already in progress at the house — IVL demanded an unbudgeted second 20-ft container that the virtual survey had not specified. Delivery in the UK in April 2026 became an ordeal for us. Despite our specifically warning IVL about the value and fragility of some items, in particular our artworks, packing of those pieces was inconsistent: some were properly wrapped and boxed; others were placed in boxes of clothes alongside heavy items and were broken on arrival. A considerable number of furniture items were not wrapped at all before containerisation. Furniture pieces dismantled by IVL in Texas arrived spread across multiple boxes, sometimes with labels, sometimes without, with small parts such as knobs and screws currently unaccounted for. IVL’s UK agent then refused to reassemble those items, on the basis that the work was outside their instructed scope. A structural point that future customers should understand: IVL is not, on an international job like ours, the company that performs every part of the move. The UK destination services in our case were carried out by a separate, sub-contracted company, not by IVL itself. When damage and missing items came to light, our experience has been of each company pointing at the other as the responsible party, with us in the middle. Before contracting an international move with IVL, we would advise asking in writing which destination services IVL will perform itself and which will be sub-contracted, and obtaining the precise scope-of-work and standard terms governing each leg. In our view much of the packing-side problem is connected to staffing. Packing took several days. The crew that initially arrived was undersized for the scope of the move; later in the process the team appeared to recognise this and brought in additional packers under time pressure. The variable quality of the packing across our shipment looks to us like the visible result of that improvisation. A major-brand US sofa-bed is currently sitting in our UK car park: it was delivered broken, we refused to accept it, and IVL’s agent refused to remove it. A major-brand US motorised standing desk is currently in pieces around our house: it was dismantled by IVL in Texas, parts of it were delivered unwrapped, and IVL’s agent refused to reassemble it on the same scope-of-instruction grounds. After the damage was identified, IVL telephoned us, for the first time, to demand an additional USD 15,000 retrospective storage-in-transit insurance fee. Future customers should be aware that, in our experience, IVL’s response to problems relies heavily on the consumer’s precise compliance with standard-form contractual notices issued during the move itself — and on time-limited contractual get-out clauses that may not be flagged before things go wrong. Read every document carefully, keep your own dated copies of everything signed during packing, and do not assume that an unhurried later opportunity to raise concerns will be available. We have served formal written complaints; a Federal Maritime Commission CADRS request and a UK consumer-law complaint are in preparation. UPDATE: You can see IVL's response to this review made shortly after posting. The facts in it speak for themselves, and IVL don't attempt to challenge any of them in their response. It's easy to suggest "there are two sides to every story" — but that framing implies a reasonable excuse for IVL's behaviour, and IMHO there simply isn't one. In a telephone conversation with IVL after I discovered the loss and damage, their first substantive reaction was to try to blame me for their poor packing — apparently I hadn't complained enough at the time. IVL's reply also promises that "management" will be in touch; I'll update this thread if and when that actually happens. It's their job to do their job, their job to control their subcontractors and agents, and their job to identify a way to actually address the chaos they have created. They are not being 'disparaged', they are being called out. [Note: the 'date of experience' is for the first delivery into the UK, there were periods of storage in both the USA and UK, with IVL or their subcontractors.]
Response from International Van LinesApr 30, 2026
Gary, First, I’d like to sincerely apologize for the frustration you experienced during your move. That’s never the experience we aim to provide. There are several details surrounding your move that aren’t fully reflected here, but our focus remains on addressing your concerns and working toward a fair resolution. We’ve successfully handled tens of thousands of moves over the years, and our team takes situations like this seriously. We understand that you’re dissatisfied, and we've acknowledged your feedback. A member of our management team will be reaching out to you directly to review everything in detail and resolve any outstanding issues.


