Mark C.
Sharp Practice
I manage a US company from the UK, with no premises in the US, other than the temporary campuses we use in the summer to welcome young, foreign students to the US for two weeks - effectively, an export business for the US. I need to get my staff background checked and HireRight allowed me to do this, prior to and subject to their credentialling process. I failed this for no explicable reason, yet they pursued me for over $600 for the reports they allowed me to run, but refused to give me access to them. I know of no other company who can charge for a service, not provide the service, yet claim the invoice. Sharp practise does not even get near describing this. I am now using CheckR who, quite the opposite, are so much better and easier to work with, and, guess what, they produce reports when I pay for them! I would fight them but I do not know how consumer law works in the US - I know that in the UK, this would not happen! The lawyers would be the only winners. If anyone from the company reads this, make sure it is very clear when anyone opens an account that you will not supply your service, though you will charge for it if credentialling is refused...be transparent from the outset.
Response from HireRightJul 14, 2023
Hi Mark, Thank you for taking the time to provide a review. We are very sorry that you had an unsatisfactory experience with HireRight, though we would like to thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. HireRight’s Client Engagement Team just sent you an email about resolving this matter. If you would like to provide additional feedback about your experience, feel free to reach out to us at [email protected].




