CasinomeisterReviews of casinomeister.com

Poor experience with PAB. They are affiliates. Used their PAB due to issue with a casino. They stopped engaging because I had previously instructed a solicitor (Altho no longer). PAB then just ignored. They are casino affiliates, they make money from you signing up with their links and losing money. Shouldn't expect anything different I suppose. Website looks like it hasn't been updated in about 20 years.

My experience with Casinomeister has been extremely disappointing. I reached out to them for help with resolving disputes, only to find a platform that is completely outdated and unresponsive to current industry standards. ​Instead of focusing on mediation, Casinomeister takes an unnecessarily hostile approach. They immediately used my French nationality as an excuse to claim I shouldn't have been playing, without even asking for evidence or trying to understand the actual situation. It is unacceptable for a self-proclaimed mediation site to act in a way that is even more obstructive and dismissive than the casinos themselves. ​Their process is slow, archaic, and lacks the efficiency that players expect today. Fortunately, I was able to rely on the mediation services of AskGamblers and Casino Guru. Thanks to their professionalism and modern approach, I was able to resolve my disputes and successfully recover my winnings (specifically 1,500€ from Pandido and 4,500€ from Caspero). ​I strongly advise against using Casinomeister. If you are facing a real issue, turn to platforms that provide actual, effective support for players."

After my initial review, Max had decided to respond with utter nonsense. What makes this entire situation so ridiculous is that Casinomeister keeps framing the timeline in a way that leaves out critical facts. First, they continue implying that I canceled a withdrawal and immediately redeposited while the original bonus funds were still active. That is false. The withdrawal that was canceled was played completely down to a $0 balance. Only AFTER the balance was exhausted did I redeem another bonus code, make another deposit, and continue playing. The winnings in question came after that sequence. I had screenshots and transaction history showing this. Second, I was instructed to keep my complaint short and concise during the investigation. Despite having additional screenshots and evidence available, I was never asked to provide them before a decision was made. Later, the narrative became “you never submitted evidence,” even though there was never a proper evidence review process in the first place. Third — and this is the part that makes the “abuse of services” accusation so absurd — I was labeled for “abuse of services” BEFORE I ever publicly criticized Casinomeister or posted any review. One of their staff members privately messaged me during the investigation and I responded. Somehow, responding during an active investigation later became grounds to accuse me of abusing their services and eventually ban my account. Then afterward, Max stated that if I could provide evidence, he would reopen the case — which directly contradicts the idea that the case had already been fully and fairly investigated. He also stated that he discussed my financial records with the casino and concluded I was “lying” based on information provided by the casino itself, before ever reviewing the screenshots and evidence I had available. That is not what neutral dispute resolution is supposed to look like. People can draw their own conclusions, but from my perspective this looked far less like independent arbitration and far more like an industry-connected forum protecting long-standing casino relationships while dismissing evidence and shutting down players who challenge the outcome.

Really poor handling of PAB, poor behaviour from MAXD (His repuation is well known). Signed up to a site they affiliate with 'Casinovibes' they verified me, then locked account after I deposited, requesting more KYC then closed account and eventually refunded the deposit. Also they refused to honour the offer promoted on casinomeister. They lied during the PAB process (actually didn't engage so one member had to contact them outside of the complaint). MAXD didn't read PAB properly, didn't look at the uplaoded evidence (if he had he wouldn't have wasted time asking questions that could be answered by looking at my evidence) then referred to me as 'snarky'. So poor all round. But what do you expect from casino affiliates? Edit - Max response - Again highlighting the unprofessionalism and interest only being in affiliate kickbacks from us punters signing up to their awful sites. If he had have looked at my previous posts in the PAB (as I pointed out to him) he would have seen the uploaded evidence of the casino discussing my deposit. Again, what do you expect from affiliates and this 'Max' has a reputation of being mysoginistic, you can see it on the forum. Their website also looks like it was made in early 2000s lol

Most reviews of Casinomeister (CM) are informed by 1 resolved issue. Trustpilot is saturated with inch-deep praise for CM doing basic things they've become adept at commoditizing. I've been a full-time pro gambler for 19 years. I've initiated 8 complaints and have a much deeper perspective of how CM behaves under true litmus tests. Truth and the public interest are secondary priorities that get trumped by what's good for CM's bottom line. Only 4000 chars so must use more adjectives than I prefer. Only have space for summary detail. Side note: despite all their libel, faulty assessment, insincerity, laziness, inaction, cocksure lack of introspection, and toxic alpha-male energy, CM's still better than Casino Guru (see my review). Both CM and Casino Guru have conflicts of interest inherent to their business model. Devoid of proper regulatory oversight, the casino industry is rife with bad actors. As a high volume, gambler for 19 years, situations arose. In real time, there were no issues with my 8 complaints at CM. However, when moderator Max Drayman took stock of my complaint volume, there was a stark change in his conduct. He disliked I exclusively used his site for leverage in complaints and that I would post at more than one site. I posted that it could be good to be slightly provocative in your posts since it'd provoke responses which'd increase views which'd extend your leverage if you made a good point. Of all CM's trash talk, this tepid comment Drayman singles out as overstep and has since been unamicable, even belligerent. Sequentially: Won ~$5000 progressive jackpot. Get stiffed for no valid reason. CM's initial impulse was to do nothing. I remind CM if I don't get paid, money in that jackpot goes to nobody. Only then does CM act. Casino group stiffs me for $44,400 in tourney bonus prizes + $2,000. Wait a month for CM to respond - nothing. CM terminates complaint. Later CM accuses me of frivolous complaints and not following through on them. Had prosecuted this complaint elsewhere to the point of exhaustion. Casino tries to charge me $36,000 in processing fees on a $605K win. This scale of fee not supported by T&C and contradicted what I had been told when I asked preemptively before win. CM does not downtick casino's rating and blocks the most sanitized summary of it that I tried to post. Casino voids $4800 for an accidental bet over $10 max wager on which I win nothing and have no angle to make. Wording of the rules unambiguously gives no grounds for casino to do so. CM empowers casino not to pay me and buries incident on their page for that casino despite the fact it got by far the most public views/responses/support relative to other postings. Casino obviously fabricates tournament scores and then stiffs me for $111,758. Since then, casino group gets 37 Trustpilot reviews, all 1-star. CM superficially condemns casino but talks out of both sides of mouth, empowering casino to get away with it while attacking me and editing out basic facts in my favor. Casino is still found nowhere on CM's negative review lists. CM takes backhanded approach by admonishing me with vague, misdiagnosed rant at end of one of my other posts. CM attacks me for alleged dishonesty, refuses to substantiate attacks, locks me off from responding. This was not for my elucidation. It was intended spectacle. CM could have used PM. This gets picked up by transgressing casino who exploit it to get my complaint dismissed at Casino Guru. Even knowing they are effectively exonerating a casino they had just condemned, CM refuses to retract. Write extensive rebuttal - ignored. As absolute last resort, try to litigate for libel, seeking only discrete retraction with generous terms. CM immediately terminates my account and accuses me of "countless" unspecified forum violations. CM hides behind lawyers of parent conglomerate and refuse to address any details. Make bad faith claim were immune because accounts were "anonymous". No lawyers endorsed this. Obvious evidence account was mine. Dispensed insults. Beyond cease & desist, my legal contacts fail to follow up, no reason stated (see my other reviews). Offending casino's reputation plummets and Casino Guru proves absolutely intractable, so the point by and by becomes mute. Some CM attacks didn't even make sense. I put things in writing publicly, but I was trying to gaslight 'em?? Drayman clearly over-depended on memory, failed to properly review, and suffered from fragmented continuity. CM'd conflate normal complaint prosecution as having "an agenda", a nebulous turn of phrase they themselves are guilty of. CM is not a neutral, dispassionate arbiter. Outside which casinos are paying or not, the forums are the blind leading the blind. They will not help you become an advantage player.

IF I COULD GIVE THIS SITE A NEGATIVE I WOULD OMG SO LISTEN TO THIS I GO ON THERE BECAYSE I WANTED TO WRITE A GOOD REVIEW FOR Jackpotter THEY SAID YES GO HERE TO CASINO MEISTER SO I DO I POST A REVIEW THEN I GET FEEDBACK FROM SOME NASTY PERSON AND BOOM BANNED FROM THE SITE. WHATS WRONG WITH THIS WORLD IM STARTING TO QUESTION JACKPOTTER NOW TOO WHICH SUCKS BECAUSE THATS THE 2 WEBSITE THAT HAS DONE THAT AND THEY TOLD ME TO GO THERE BUT MY ISSUE IS THERES NEGATIVE REVIEWS ALL OVER THAT WEBSITE AND THERE STILL A PART OF IT BUT I WRITE A GOOD ONE AND IM BANNED WTH!!! CASINOMEISTER IM GOOD WITH NOT BEING A PART OF YOUR NEGATIVE TRASHY SITE I HOPE YOU GET A CLUE AND REALLY RECONSIDER YOUR " RULES"!

I was permanently banned from CasinoMeister after trying to open a serious thread about irregularities in an online casino game. I didn’t present the full evidence right away because I wanted to see the community’s reaction first ,something many users do. However, the moderator ( Dunover ) abruptly closed the thread saying “nothing new was being added,” even though the thread only had 4 pages (while others have over 20 or more). Later, when the same casino was being criticized by other users and even publicly flagged by the platform itself, I commented again to mention that my original thread had been shut down. Right after that, I was banned with no warning or chance to explain. At no point did I insult anyone, spam, or behave like a troll. I simply tried to present a sensitive issue step by step. I believe I was treated unfairly, especially by a platform that claims to protect players and support transparency. Thank you for your response, Mr. Max Drayman. I find it somewhat cowardly that you choose to hide behind the “Casinomeister Team” signature instead of addressing me directly under your own name. In my case, Casinomeister did receive all the technical evidence directly, and they even sent it to the provider. However, my thread was closed after only four pages with the argument that it “wasn’t going anywhere,” while there are threads in the forum with 20, 30, or even 40 pages full of irrelevant messages that remain open. It is legitimate to ask: why the special focus on mine? Was there outside pressure to close it? The closure was not due to a lack of evidence, but because the topic was inconvenient. I also noticed that my name has been mentioned repeatedly. My name is public everywhere, even here on Trustpilot alongside my email address. That does me no harm. I was not a problematic person; I was someone who touched on topics that affect certain interests within that platform — a platform that claims to protect players, but in practice suffocates them with promotions and bonuses. This is not genuine player protection, but just another tool to push bonuses. Furthermore, I consider it discriminatory to state that all my texts were AI-generated. That is simply not true. The AI was only helping me translate what I wanted to say, as English is not my strong language. Suggesting otherwise sends the message that only those who speak perfect English are welcome in your forum, which is both exclusionary and discriminatory.

Kannst vergessen. Wenn du gegen deren TOP casinos schlecht postest wirst du gesperrt. Auf oshi.io und N1 habe ich die schlechteste Erfahrungen gehabt meines Lebens. So manipulierte Casinos findest du nirgendwo und da sind die Top casinos.