Blue Edge FinancialReviews of blueedgefinancial.com

Very disappointed in this whole experience. Been with the company since Sept/Oct 2025 (bought the unlimited license). At this point, I have made some money from payouts - but have only recovered the initial investment, and *maybe* made a dent into the evals. Here's my biggest beef - i.e. the sales process painted a MUCH rosier picture, and did not disclose several important factors: 1. This whole process takes a LOT of capital to maintain. These forex evals are VERY expensive ($500/piece compared to $100/piece for most futures prop firms). And you either need to put a lot money into buying tons of evals, or you need to have a lot of money to set aside for hedging. If you're not hedging, you need to be spending approximately $10k/mth on evals, every month (to maintain about 10 funded accounts). Without stopping. EVERY MONTH. Even if you're not getting payouts. Just trusting (hoping) it's going to work. Yes, you could reinvest any payouts into this, and (potentially) stop throwing down your own money. Yes they recommend this hedging strategy, but that requires a good $2k/account (so like $20k set aside for hedgin), and you still need to buy a ton of evals. 2. Prop firm risks - the amount of trustworthy prop firms is actually quite small, and even though I bought an "unlimited" license, the potential is capped. Have had several prop firms that have flagged me for algo trading and banned us. One of these lost me about $25k in pending payouts. Not to mention the eval costs that were not refunded. 3. BEF does try to mitigate the prop firm risk, by modifying the settings on Titan. But guess what, then that often lands you with a poor performing algo. Because they aren't able to optimize the algo settings per the risks of having too many traders making the same trades. The end result: the algo trading record is pretty mediocre. And you could - just by luck of the draw - end up with a crappy set of algo settings while someone else at BEF happens to be killing it. Using the same Titan. They had this whole pitch, of how they use the crowd to source the "best settings/performance" - but the reality doesn't line up. Bottom line - I'm not surprised all of this was conveniently left out of the sales pitch. Cause they probably wouldn't sell very many people on joining! Does it work........maybe (if you're willing to throw enormous sums of money at this, the odds will eventually work in your favor). But be prepared that you will need to spend about $100k/year on evals. If you spend less than that, it *might* still work for you - i.e. you could get lucky, and happen to be one of those people in the testimonies where you get a winning streak and make a killing right away. But.....you could also be one of the people (that aren't part of the testimonies), where it didn't work at all. Important Note: they do model that you could reinvest the initial earnings, back into buying evals. Which helps mitigate the use of your own capital in buying evals. And statistically, this *does* work. The math checks out. But again, the problem, is that this "math" is the statistical average from MANY people doing this here. Not what YOUR actual performance might end up being. What's likely going to happen, is that BEF is going to respond to this - look at my account, and note that I haven't purchased enough evals to see this through. And thus am not really "doing the plan." But as I already mentioned, had I known from the beginning the enormous sums of money that this would require - I honestly wouldn't have signed up. I use other trading algos (on futures) from another company, and their algo performance far outperforms Titan. I thought Forex trading would have been a nice diversification. Not that it would be a gauntlet that was going to require tremendous faith to keep throwing money down over and over again, hoping you're one of the lucky ones and that it would "work." So yeah, I didn't "do the plan." But as I mentioned, this "plan" was not fully disclosed in the sale process. Thus, why I'm trying to do community service here via this post: ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK - YOU'VE BEEN WARNED. I know that BEF is going to drop a disclaimer that "trading involves risk, and past performance isn't guaranteed, blah, blah, blah." And yes, that disclaimer gets you out of legal trouble. But just because you're "legal" doesn't mean it's ethical - conveniently leaving out important details to help people understanding the full extent of the risks/costs. How about this.....show someone a Monte Carlo simulation, where they are aiming for 10 funded accounts. Show them how many times, out of 10 simulations, that they lose money with your system. Really paint that picture. Then let people decide! Per BEF's reply: Still missing the point that this was OVERSOLD as a more lucrative opportunity than reality.

I love the fact that the whole process can run automatically without having to sit in front of the computer for 8-12 hours a day. I want to be knowledgeable about the entire process, so I don't mind doing the research and doing certain things myself, but I don't want to have to be chained to the computer all day. I believe the system is good, but the bottom line is being successful and I have not been. I feel there should be more one on one coaching or something similar to that. If the coaches and top people are successful (or at least most of them) then the people that are at the bottom of the trading totem pole, should be successful as well. I am sticking with BEF because I am not a quitter and also hoping for the breakthrough to come but I am not happy with the results thus far !

This is a legitimate business, but their advertisements make everything sound much simpler than it actually is. They present a very convincing risk and business model with strong success percentages, which initially drew me in. After studying the model, I began my journey on August 25 and committed significant time and effort to making it work. I have a background in IT and business, yet I still found the system to be far more complex and difficult to learn than expected. I pushed through that learning curve and began running challenges. One of the first realities I encountered was that the warranty only extends until you are funded with your first prop firm account. “Funded” does not mean you are receiving payouts—it simply means you have passed the evaluation and can trade a live account. As a result, my warranty expired before I had made any profits. For me, that created a “burn the ships” moment where I felt fully committed with no real path to step back, so I doubled down and kept going. At the same time, the technology and its implementation were not static. They changed regularly, requiring continuous training just to stay up to date. What initially seemed like a structured system turned into something that required ongoing adjustment and attention. I did eventually receive a payout, but that’s when the more difficult challenges began. Many prop firms do not allow the use of automated trading systems like the ones being used here. As I gained more experience, it became clear that operating successfully often required working around those restrictions—whether that meant masking the use of the technology or managing multiple accounts in ways that were not entirely transparent. That realization was a turning point for me, as it no longer aligned with my personal values. Even when firms cannot definitively detect these systems, they can recognize patterns and behaviors that raise concerns. They are aware of this type of activity and actively monitor for it. In my experience, once you have received a few payouts, the environment changes. Firms may begin to scrutinize your accounts more closely, restrict activity, or deny future payouts. Whether or not they can prove anything, the result is the same—you are operating under constant uncertainty. Another major challenge is that prop firm rules are not stable. They change frequently, which forces you to continually adjust settings and stay current with each firm’s evolving requirements. Keeping up with these changes while actively running challenges adds a significant and ongoing workload that is not clearly communicated upfront. Because of all of this, the risk model presented at the beginning feels incomplete. It focuses on trading outcomes but does not fully account for losses that come from account shutdowns, denied payouts, or being removed from platforms altogether. In practice, a meaningful portion of the “risk” comes from the firms themselves, not just market performance. This also leads to a considerable amount of time spent dealing with disputes, chargebacks, and trying to recover funds. In my case, I reached a point where one prop firm shut down multiple accounts I had opened with them after I requested a payout. I ultimately went through a complex chargeback process involving seven separate purchases, which took several months to resolve. Once that process was complete, I was able to recover my initial capital and break even. At that point, I made the decision to step away. What was presented as something that was simply “not easy but straightforward if you stay consistent” turned out to be highly complex, stressful, and mentally draining. The constant friction with prop firms, combined with the ethical concerns and operational demands, had a noticeable negative impact on my quality of life and time with my family. I do believe that, under the right circumstances, this model could work. If someone has substantial discretionary capital—not only to fund multiple accounts but also to pay for higher-tier services—and is not concerned with the timeline to profitability or the need to monitor things closely, it could potentially become profitable over time as the probabilities play out. However, for someone working with a more limited amount of capital—such as $10,000 to $15,000—and trying to actively grow that capital while navigating the realities of these prop firms, I did not find this to be a good fit.

Blue Edge Financial requested that I place a deposit on December 2nd to secure a spot. Prior to making the deposit, I was informed it was refundable, and my representative assured me that I would receive a refund. Subsequently, I received an email stating my membership had been cancelled due to a chargeback, and I never received the refund. I ultimately decided not to proceed at that time, although I had intended to move forward later. Please be cautious before moving forward. Follow up 4/13/26: Your rep stated I was received a refund back and it would take a longer time to process. Ironically no one will respond to email. I would be willing for you publicly to show proof of the agreement stating such that there was no refund and show proof that i signed it. I will be filing a real challenge with my bank shortly to dispute this. please be cautious before moving forward with Blue edge Financial. I was contacted back by someone with BLue Edge Financial recently they did send me my $2k deposit back. Said John my rep was no longer with the company. He was the one that assured me they was going to refund my money back. I would recommend to ensure you review any documentation from the before you commit to join.

I'm out over $2000 between the cost of Titan plus the fees of many challenges, VPS, trade copier, etc. I purchased Titan for $4000. I qualified for the refund at the 5 month mark but let Prit talk me in to a partial refund of $2k and an agreement that he would help me until I passed challenges and got my investment back. He did pass one challenge (that was the only one that passed in a year). I received a $300 payout then Prit was promoted and could no longer help me. I was assigned a new coach and given free white glove service. My new coach always referred me to WGS or support. The level of service greatly decreased compared to the service Prit gave me. I never passed another challenge and the challenge Prit passed for me failed with the new EA white glove service put in place. The whole process is very complicated and requires many products. BEF needs to improve the EA's so they are consistently profitable instead of having the philosphy of keep prop farming and eventually you'll profit.

I've been here 3 months and still unable to make a profit. Some are able to show profits, but I am unsure how. I will try to update this as time goes. Update 1 Feb 21, 2024, Still having issues making profits.

My experience so far is lots of great videos and they respond well but dont give enough time to walk you through and get your challenge setup. For the money I spent I would like to see more time in the walk through part. Lets see.

The coaches are great people. The software sucks: can’t tell you how many accounts got blown using their system. The cancellation policy sucks - terminate immediately is the only option. While the cancellation policy is clearly defined, I asked customer service about it and they asked me “did you look at the policy?” My account automatically renewed, which I missed by a few months. So I paid for two years of crap service. Do not recommend and as another reviewer stated, betting a lot of their bad reviews are removed. Buyer beware.