kc Y.
Must read to those looking to engage their service!
To those looking to engage professional, independent, reliable and efficient background due diligence service provider, avoid sterling risq..because they have none of the qualities. Some, amongst many ridiculousness, unexpected and unacceptable from a professional “subject matter expert” in background check: 1. Messy, unorganized strategy, blatant lack of plan or diligence in handling every case. Multiple requests for additional information, which could be consolidated if reviewer actually does thorough, end-to-end, diligently check all information provided to compile gaps..instead, the manner of haphazard requests suggest with conviction that reviewer simply perform partial checks, pushes the ball back to subject’s court with “insufficient information” excuse, and delay the due diligence check progress…potential client, is this the kind of professionalism that your company is willing to pay for? 2. Enquiring information that are Irrelevant to subject’s current scope of work. Pretext, candidate provided professional bodies certificates, unique membership identifier, institution which granted the certification, signed consent to verify certification with the institution. With such powerful combination of arsenal, it is unacceptable that sterling risq still couldn’t verify the certification and have to insist on information such as campus the subject undertook with, failing to respond would constitute recalcitrant..on a certification that was acquired almost 2 decades ago. I emphasise, 2 decades ago. Does this appear to be a competent professional background checker? Echoing multiple bad reviews published, independently, my personal experience with sterling risq is they are incompetent, overrated and their deliverables quality does not justify the cost paid to engaging their “professional” service. I could do more with Google searches, at faster turnaround time, and certainly way more when a lot of proprietary information was provided. 1 word to summarise, incompetence.




