Sam
It's a waste of time
It's a waste of time. They always offer a revised offer that is much lower than their initial offer and always cite a ridiculous explanation that is made up. In my case, they reduced their offer from $197 to $137 because to "scratches on the screen" - the screen has no scratches. They are just a dishonest company trying to rip of customers. The phone condition I selected was "Good", not Flawless. The battery was above 80%, the screen has no defects or scratches and everything worked perfectly. It met every criteria they listed, but their business relied on offering a high price and then adjusting it after the fact .
Response from SecondHandCellJul 8, 2026
We're sorry to hear you're disappointed with your experience. Our revised offers are never arbitrary or "made up." Every device is physically inspected upon arrival and evaluated according to the condition guidelines that are published on our website before a trade-in is submitted. For a device to qualify as Flawless condition, it must: * Look new with no signs of use. * Have no scratches, scuffs, or any other cosmetic imperfections visible to the naked eye. * Appear as if it just came out of its original packaging. If our inspection finds visible scratches or other cosmetic wear, the device no longer meets the Flawless standard and is regraded accordingly. This is not unique to your device—every trade-in is graded using the same published criteria. If you disagree with the evaluation, we always offer the option to have your device returned at no charge rather than requiring you to accept the revised offer. We strive to make our grading process transparent and consistent for every customer.


