ReutersReviews of reuters.com

Looking for balanced news. This rules out BBC and Sky, obviously. Alas, Reuters immediately asks to install cookies on my device, gives me the option to decline - which I take - then asks me again and again, presumably hoping I’ll throw in the towel and agree. Absolutely fed-up with this sort of treatment. Why on earth isn’t ‘no cookies’ the default setting? Of course I don’t want to be tracked, monitored or have my details ‘shared’ with third parties. Who wants that? So much for balanced news: I never even got that far.

Probably the only news source that's worth reading these days, particularly around the lunacy of the covid world as we know it. All other news sources seem to be much of fake news.

it's mostly spam. spam spam. spam spam spam spam. spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam reuters are obviously not paying their social media intern enough coffee. most of the replies to their social media updates are spam. you could place the spam accounts on ignore. that's not really the point tho, is it? maybe reuters has a monkey who posts the updates, who can't actually read. maybe the monkey actually wants to buy business cards

I find that Reuters is a good global and national news source. I do notice quite a bit of bias in the reporting and have lodged complaints with them but the fella that I complained to, Brian Moss, seemed to be not interested and disregarded my concerns. If you have half a brain you can understand the bias wording that is used by their writers and they seem to be obsessed with illegal immigrants in America and not with all the illegal migrants sneaking into the UK.

Reuters was one of my staple news sources until it became apparent that its stories are pro-Israel. The propagandist "Gaza militants launch barrages across border, Israel hits back with air strikes" was simply sickening to read in its attempts to identify the Palestinian people of Gaza and their dead family members as 'Islamic Jihadist militants', justifying Israel's slaughter by tank and jet attacks. Naming the 116 Palestinians murdered by Israel during the Palestinian protests in recent weeks (on their own land) in the context of 'weeks of border violence', the article hints at a parity between Israel and Palestinians held captive in what amounts to a concentration camp that is Gaza. Yet the photos on Reuters show minor damage to a 'kindergarten' in Israel as an alleged target of Palestinian militants, with no photos showing the polluted slum conditions that the Palestinians must endure daily under Israeli brutality, and the thousands of buildings demolished by Israeli bombs and bulldozers. There is, of course, no parity of force between Palestine and Israel as implied by this biased Reuters article, that would have readers believe the Israeli propaganda that 'Israel is simply defending itself against Jihadists'. The truth is that Palestinians have tried to defend their land against Israeli attacks by using improvised weapons: stones, burning tyres and homemade rockets. Israel has state-of-the-art weapons sold to them by the UK and US. Palestinians, unlike their opposition Israeli death squads, don't possess fighter jets, bombers, tanks, snipers or nuclear weapons. Palestinians haven't stolen any land, they don't invade Israeli homes, confiscate them, demolish them and build new settlements on their foundations. Palestinians haven't engaged in decades of ethnic cleansing, or forced more than a million people from their own land. The Israelis have and still do all of these things, and have been doing so for 70 years with absolute impunity. (watch John Pilger's film "Palestine is Still The Issue". he's a real journalist). The Reuters story mentioned above is an example of a brand of lies of spin and omission peddled to the west that allows us to remain complacent to the 70 year genocide and enduring holocaust committed by Israel upon the Palestinian people. I thought you were better than that Reuters.