ReutersReviews of reuters.com

Not what I hoped for, they are turning into a gossipmedia

Highly reliable unbiased oufit. The problem is they want people to subscribe at a fee to be able to read their broadcasted news…! Ridiculous…!

Received an email saying charging £1 per week shortly. £4 a month is a bit steep considering Washington Post is £1 per month. I wouldn't pay £4 a month, but I would pay £1 a month. Hopefully they will see sense sooner rather than later, before people shift to other media outlets.

There are the remnants of some effort toward presenting stories objectively. I read several news sources and often on the same topic, and have for years. Reuters definitely injects a left-leaning bias in most articles now, where it used to be more centrist. And like *all left-leaning news sites now, has disabled (or never enabled) a comments section on articles. Furthering damage to free-speech and critical thought. Which to me seems telling of its motive: "*we tell you what to think, your discussion is not necessary."

it's mostly spam. spam spam. spam spam spam spam. spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam reuters are obviously not paying their social media intern enough coffee. most of the replies to their social media updates are spam. you could place the spam accounts on ignore. that's not really the point tho, is it? maybe reuters has a monkey who posts the updates, who can't actually read. maybe the monkey actually wants to buy business cards