ReutersReviews of reuters.com

I find their news to be objective, and written well. The usual suspects will claim bias and to be victims of a website in reviews as is normal. To get sympathy and attention. The downside is advert overuse. I subscribe and I’m ok with some adverts. But the top header scroll banner and in-line adverts in the middle of content is totally unacceptable for subscribers. Remove those specific adverts for subscribers and you have the right balance. If you don’t, you’ll never build a big subscriber base. Edit: 5th Dec: I’ve since cancelled my subscription. It’s a barely usable site with the adverts. I seriously regret getting an annual subscription up front.

Usually good, but occasionally slips moderate left opinions and talking points into pieces that are otherwise framed as objective articles. The sporadic way in which they do so makes it more difficult to detect unless you're paying close attention, which in a way makes it more pernicious: they prime you to accept them as objective and then try to slip something past you. Can't tell if it's confined to just a few reporters or not.

The reporting and quality of Reuters is second to none, and I wish I could give it 5 stars. But, you guys report on stuff not really relevant to the U.K.. I’m aware you have a U.K. section but it’s rare you’ll notify me on anything U.K. related in the first place. Please make a bit of a pivot for us British users, thanks.

Great great great journalism