Paul S.
The information on the database bears...
The information on the database bears little or no resemblance to any facts. If I could have rated 0 stars, I would have. All the information for my dogs is wrong and published without consent.
Pedigreepedia is a world wide animal pedigree database.
Pedigreepedia (pedigreepedia.com) has 15 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 1.5 out of 5.
Is this your business?
Correct your details and reply to customers in public. Both are free.
Claim this listing15 approved reviews, newest moderated first
Paul S.
The information on the database bears little or no resemblance to any facts. If I could have rated 0 stars, I would have. All the information for my dogs is wrong and published without consent.
Anne F.
One of the worst examples of inaccurate information I have ever seen. The information is totally wrong in many cases and has obviously been taken from other sources. Contacting the owner asking him to remove information leads to a comment where he is asking you to link him to your information and when this is refused there is no reply. Please do not use this site.
Millesime
Do not trust the information on this website! Dreadful site full of incorrect information & stolen photographs. Listing male dogs incorrectly as females with errors on date of birth & ownership. Using photographs harvested without the express permission of the owner of the photograph despite watermarks is a violation of copyright! It's also laughable that the owner of the website rates his own page 5 Stars!
Lindsay
I’ve had to give this a one star rating although I’d have rather given it no stars. The majority of the information held on this database is, at best, inaccurate & misleading & in some cases laughable. One dog actually has the surname of a human listed as a sibling! There are also photographs which carry copyright that have been used without permission. For anyone wanting information on specific dogs, this is not the place to find it!
Treloyhan
This is an appalling example of gross misconduct and theft, inaccurate data and crass representation. Unfortunately, there are many people who will use photos without permission, whether it’s because of ignorance or malicious intent. These personal photos have been "stolen" and reproduced without permission. The fact that you are reproducing my photos, displaying them publicly, distributing them to others, and creating derivative works from them is violating my copyright. From the moment you snap your photographs, they are protected: you don’t have to register them or mark them as copyrighted; they belong to you. Violating copyright is a crime. You have been asked to remove the photographs and data and you refuse to do so, therefore you will be subject to the law.
Ms Yvonne F.
This website has taken information that is private on other sites and used for his own ends.. I have asked him to remove my dogs from his list and to date her has refused to do so.. legal action will be taken soon.
Dawid K.
Best pedigree database