One Legal is the most comprehensive online court filing and process serving tool in the U.S. Easily submit and serve court filings, manage case documents in an accessible and easily searchable portfolio, and reduce the risk of error or rejection with our powerful compliance features. Learn more at onelegal.com
One Legal | An InfoTrack Company (onelegal.com) has 419 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 4.4 out of 5.
Also known as
onelegal.com
Website
onelegal.com
Category
Legal Service Providers
Location
Petaluma
Listed on Five Star Index
2026
About these reviews
Replies
The company replied to 11% of reviews.
Latest
Most recent review: October 2026.
Edits
Reviews are shown as their authors wrote them. The company can reply, but cannot edit them.
Score
This company cannot pay to remove reviews or change its score.
Screwed up serving a notice of hearing. Didn’t Efile it with court. Instead made 13 new proof of service docs and efiled all 13 — billed me for all the excessive work. Ghosted me when I brought it to their attention. Missed correcting the work in time for my court hearing today after I have been working with them to fix and review for weeks. Very disappointed and excessively billed.
GS
George “Sonik” G.
My experience with OneLegal
My experience with OneLegal has been extremely disappointing. Their portal gives the clear impression that you can seamlessly e-file and serve your paperwork in one straightforward bundle. The platform even walks you through the same questions required on the SC-100 form, which reasonably leads users to believe that the information is being digitally submitted as part of the filing.
However, OneLegal fails to disclose that you must still submit the original SC-100 form separately. This resulted in unnecessary double data entry, first into their portal, and then again on the physical form that you must upload. If the SC-100 is what the court actually needs, OneLegal should simply instruct users to upload the completed form from the beginning instead of creating a misleading, time-wasting process. I believe they intentionally want the end user to make mistakes because OneLegal makes its money on errors unless you pay a higher fee to get it done by them.
To make matters worse, I ended up re-filing and on my second attempt, they failed to serve the papers to the defendant. I entered all the correct information needed to serve the defendant, yet OneLegal put the blame back on me, claiming the information was never provided. That makes no sense because their own system would not have allowed me to proceed with the order unless those fields were completed, especially since this was processed as a bundle. Plus, the information was on the SC-100 form. Instead of acknowledging a possible issue on their end, their customer service repeatedly shifted fault onto me.
Based on my experience, and after seeing similar complaints from other reviews, it’s clear their system does, in fact, have problems. Their customer service shows little empathy, refuses to take accountability, and they seem convinced their platform is flawless, despite evidence to the contrary.
I strongly advise staying away from this company. The process is misleading, inefficient, and their support team offers no real assistance when their system fails and you need help.
TM
TM
They do not generate a proof of service…
They do not generate a proof of service when e-filing this is a basic thing that multiple other e-filers provide. When I talk to support they blamed it on rules of court but could not point me to an actual rule that says that. So it sounds like they're now lying to try to cover up the fact that they can't generate proof of services maybe they don't have the engineering skills to do that but whatever it is just avoid these guys
VI
Vicky
That company is a JOKE!!
That company is a JOKE!!!
They efiled my documents to the wrong court , and delivered the courtesy copy also to the wrong court!!!!! BEYOND STUPIDITY!!! When I reviewed their records and their affidavit of delivery, saying that I was angry would be an understatement. I called them, wrote clear instructions, and the next day they delivered not the whole package of my documents. A TOTAL FAIL , especially when the deadlines are pressing!!!! Yeah, and forget about the refund. They didn’t admit a thing about their mistakes, even when I pointed out their written statements proof.
Shocked!
BO
Borrower
AWFUL Company- They submitted someone…
AWFUL Company- They submitted someone else's documents for my case mixing them up with another customer so my filing got rejected and it was urgent so I used turbo court instead. One Legal is incompetent! DO NOT USE!!!
ET
Edee T.
Not a good company to work for
Not a good company to work for
MS
Mark S.
Don't trust using the Chat feature to request correction of an order
I am a solo practitioner in California. I have used One Legal for about 10 years. On July 8, 2024 at 6:58 PM (after business hours), I attempted to make a filing of three documents in the same case for the same hearing in the Ventura County Superior Court. I got one one-page document uploaded and couldn't find a button to add the other two documents. I hit "Submit" and then immediately did a second order for the other two. This order was completed at 7:10 PM. It took several minutes since I always do a review of uploaded documents to assure they are correct. When I received the e-mail notice about 10 minutes later that I was going to be billed $90 for each order, I sent a request to consolidate the orders. That request was sent via the One Legal web page and was made no more than a half hour following the last of my two submissions. I received acknowledgement on July 9 that the orders were worked during business hours that day. I just received a notice that my request to consolidate was "too late" to be corrected. Really? The Order wasn't worked until at least 12 hours later. I guess I should have called instead of relying on the Chat feature.
KM
Kyle M.
Incompetence and lies
I should have read these reviews first... yikes. I ordered a process server thinking it would be an easy job. The recipient was informed that a server would be in touch and was ready to accept the documents.
The server shows up to the address and... talks to the neighbor before promptly giving up. He said that there was a gate at the address and therefore I would need to buy a "stakeout".
I asked customer support why he didn't bother to use the phone number provided and this is what they told me (in order):
1) The server wasn't instructed to use the phone number (that needs to be asked for?)
2) There actually weren't any contact details provided (details were provided)
3) Their system messed up and didn't transmit the details (ok.. no refund?)
4) I should have purchased an upgraded package to get the ability for a phone call to be made (why?)
5) I should have instructed the use of a phone number (we're back here again)
I asked them how I could have possibly known that I needed to purchase an upgrade package or include a note that says "please use the provided phone number". They said their server did a good job and therefore none of my concerns matter and I won't get a refund.