NurpReviews of nurp.com

Yes. Some clients make a lot of money as promised . But, if you’re new to trading or have no experience, this is extremely risky. We lost about $20K overnight (as many other have including their employees ). At best , we only made 3-4 % monthly since October . We followed their guidelines and were conservative to be careful . We paid $18k for the bot plus another $200 a month in fees. So about $43k of hard earned money lost just like that. So it was quite a loss. But this was inevitably going to happen. Nurp uses martingale. When flash moves happen in the market all accounts will blow. They’ve never had a good system. This will happen again, be WARNED . They will find a way to take down my review of course (although it’s all very accurate and no lies told. No wonder they had such great reviews for a while !). They will also take zero blame, although hundreds of their clients just lost an entire portfolio last week. Truth is , their software is faulty therefore very risky. NURP just ruined lots of lives, and they need to be held accountable . Don’t buy into their gimmicks.

I waited for well over a month after suffering heavy losses before updating my review. I wanted to ensure that my experience wasn’t clouded by emotions and that I could provide an objective, fair assessment for others to make informed decisions. I’ve been with Nurp for nearly a year, and while there have been significant frustrations, I want to acknowledge that Nurp has meant a lot to me in some ways. It introduced me to forex trading and showed me a new path toward financial freedom. For that, I am grateful, and I’ve learned a great deal—though, unfortunately, this education has come at a much higher price than I ever anticipated. My review today is based on both the lessons learned and the challenges encountered. While I’ve appreciated the insights and support, there are several issues that anyone considering Nurp should be aware of: 1. The bots lack sophistication. While some martingale behavior was expected, the bots can scale into over 200 positions per pair without proper risk management. This aggressive scaling is risky, especially with correlated pairs, and without safeguards, it led to uncontrollable losses during volatile markets. 2. Turning off auto-trading at 200% margin didn’t prevent losses. I routinely turned it off at 800% to limit damage, but this didn’t work. The algorithms trade multiple correlated pairs, compounding risk, and even the most conservative settings couldn’t stop heavy losses. 3. Diversification across bots didn’t help either. My portfolio included several bots—Gold Digger, two instances of Yellen with different settings, Fed, and two Dalios—but all scaled aggressively across correlated pairs simultaneously, leading to substantial losses. The Dalio bots, in particular, felt unfinished and experimental. When I tried to adjust the equity stop loss, both Dalios stopped functioning. It took support 7 days to respond, by which time one bot had already triggered a stop loss, causing substantial financial damage—the first of many losses. Incidentally, Dalio (their newest product) is also the first bot where the concept of Equity Stop Loss was reasonably discussed. It’s disappointing that this feature was never covered for other bots, not even in their training and setup materials—a significant oversight. 4. The recommendation to add capital when margin dropped made things worse. Following this guidance only deepened my losses, exacerbating an already bad situation. 5. The system is far from hands-off. You need a solid understanding of forex and constant monitoring to avoid major losses. Even at conservative settings, the bots can trade too aggressively for a passive income strategy. 6. The overuse of the term “Black Swan” has become a recurring issue. In the past six months alone, this phrase was used to explain events like NZDJPY in April, Gold fluctuations in April/May and June, AUDCAD and AUDNZD in July, and perhaps the “real Black Swan” involving JPY interest rate changes, USD declines, and Gold’s rise in August. While rare events do happen, the bots should have been built to better handle some level of market turbulence. Relying on “Black Swan” as an explanation feels more like an excuse for deeper flaws in the system. 7. Jeff, the owner, often talks about self-improvement and resilience—which I respect. He frequently says things like, “When I face something like this, I ask how can I be better?” Many of us have asked ourselves the same question. However, the reality is that the products simply weren’t designed to succeed under these challenging conditions. On a positive note, the support team has been exceptional throughout my time with Nurp. The team was responsive and available, even during difficult times. I was given a 3-4 month fee waiver, though the second set of licenses was not refunded despite the significant losses. While it may be possible to run this system passively with very conservative settings, this would likely result in only ~2% monthly returns—far too low to justify the risks and investment required. I personally switched between moderately aggressive and conservative settings, but none of these changes made a meaningful difference in avoiding losses. I’m still with Nurp, using what little capital I have left because the platform taught me valuable lessons and introduced me to forex trading. However, this experience has been incredibly costly, and unless you’re ready to commit full-time and absorb the high risks, I cannot recommend Nurp.

I am a full time Equity and Options trader. Learning FX trading for half a year now. I have been in the Nurp’s algo trading accelerator program for about 40 days (end Nov 2023 to end Dec 2023) where I had ample opportunity to go through every aspect of the program. Good things first = Professional service, client first attitude, excellent support, inclusive community, detailed setup videos called ‘courses’, Tax information webinar. Verifiable profits of new comers in Nov and Dec 2023. Fairly straightforward account/algo setup. Bad or doubtful things = Extremely highly priced program for selling you 4 EA (Expert Advisors). High entry fee, high monthly fees. I have trialed 2 bots – The Fed & the Gold Digger on Demo accounts. Others = Yellen and Pelosi. The fed and gold digger work on some variation of martingale strategies and no stop loss mechanism. While one does have an option to configure the ’set file’, most of the users follow the ‘course guidelines’ which has more emphasis only on controlling lot sizes. Customers are free to choose any brokers, however, ALL of the USA registered and regulated Forex brokers are not compatible with their algo. (EA needs hedging & high leverage). More often than not, the method discussed in the community to handle losses & drawdowns is to put more cash or cut out largest sized losing trades. For an experienced trader like me, this is unacceptable. Having interacted with 0percent (old avatar of Nurp) since Dec 2022 and Nurp since early 2023, some of the ‘verified’ MyFxBook links showcased then for the Fed & Pelosi bots don’t seem to be operational anymore as of early Dec 2023. Begs the question – why so? Some of their initial pre sales webinars (dated early 2023) and calls suggested that the Fed bot is having 2-3 years live track record (which by now should be 3-4 years). I haven't seen any proof of that. For a company that has a “great” algo working for them, their LinkedIn page seems to only have employees in the Sales and Support roles. I would have liked to see some Quants, Software, Cloud Infra, Domain knowledge experts, mathematicians, PhDs, etc. This makes me think that the EAs (bots) are at best - white labeled or outsourced completely. The owner, Jeff Sekinger seems to have broking accounts with brokers (as shown in MyFxBook links) that do not accept US Residents. So, either some of the brokers are unscrupulous or Jeff is not residing in USA. For me, either case don’t instill any further confidence. I am happy for Nurp and their employees to have made a business off this, and happier for the people making money at the moment. But I am extremely cautious of account blowup risks, constant lot size adjustments, 24x5 monitoring of markets and VPS - that I decided this is not for me. Fair warning on Martingale trading systems that I found online - it is not a question of “IF” but “WHEN” the account blows up. Per my risk profile, I would not invest even $1 in a system that will inevitably collapse. Disclaimers I took up Nurp on their no questions asked money back guarantee. This review is posted after the money has been successfully received back. This review is personal experience, opinion and observations only. This is not an advice to buy or not buy Nurp’s products and services. Please do make your own independent decisions, it is your hard-earned money on the line. This review also cites only the information that is/was available before I signed the user contract – i.e., the information that is available freely online or distributed/showcased by Nurp during marketing or pre sales. There are many more insights from my trial period which I may not share publicly as it may violate some unknown confidentiality clauses that I may have signed as a part of the contract.