My Pet SensitivityReviews of mypetsensitivity.com

About allergies I found out the diarrhoea for around a year was because my Blacky is allergic a chicken, duck etc. I stopped give it and now he is perfectly fine. I'm so grateful

Interesting to find out what my dog has high sensitivity/allergies to. Quick process.

I did a basic test for my two dogs, it was easy to do. I sent the samples off and results were emailed back to me in under a week. The results are clear and easy to read so you know which items to eliminate.

Fantastic! Easy test with an abundance of results! Life changing for us & our pups!

A very useful test which is easy to do and the store are there if you need any help. I'd definitely recommend them.

Received my results in under a week even during holidays. This is my second dog I’ve had tested. By removing the highly reactive items from their diet no more digestive issues or refusing to eat .Scratching and itching has improved immensely. Yes you will have to learn to read food labels very carefully but totally worth it

0 stars. The seller is a scammer Won't refund even when I havnt sent the hair. Have to go through banks. Here is why I wanted a refund after doing my research. Hair sample pet sensitivity tests are widely considered unreliable and scientifically invalid by the global veterinary community. While they are marketed as a painless way to identify food and environmental allergies, multiple peer-reviewed studies have shown that they cannot distinguish between an allergic dog and a stuffed toy. Here is why these tests are considered inaccurate: 1. Lack of Biological Basis True allergies are immune system reactions involving specific antibodies, such as Immunoglobulin E (IgE). These antibodies circulate in the blood and are present in the skin, but they are not found in hair shafts. The "Bioresonance" Myth: Many hair test companies claim to use "bioresonance" to measure "energy frequencies" or "electromagnetic signals" from the hair. There is no scientific evidence that hair emits such signals or that they have any connection to the immune system. 2. Failure in Controlled Studies In a famous 2019 study published in the Journal of Small Animal Practice, researchers submitted hair and saliva samples to a popular commercial testing company. They sent samples from: A known allergic dog. A perfectly healthy dog. Fake hair from a stuffed toy and plain water. The result: The company reported "sensitivities" for all of them, including the stuffed toy and the water. The results for the fake samples were nearly identical to those of the real dogs, proving the "analysis" was essentially random. 3. Poor Reproducibility Send the same hair twice and you will get different outcomes potentially restricting your animal of foods for no reason.

Fast delivery, good communication, and the product worked as described.