MidasReviews of midas.com

Can I give them zero? First of all, they have very little experience with what they said they could handle. They coudln't handle it. They told me I needed new headlights on my 2009 VW Beetle, and I thought I should take it to a qualified dealer, but no, they could handle it just fine. Well, they broke the headlight socket taking the old ones out, and tried to glue the new ones in, telling me it took longer than planned because someone who worked on the lights last June must have broke that piece. NO ONE worked on the lights last June. I proved that. They continued to lie every chance they got, never telling me to bring it in for another fix, or telling me their fix was temporary. When I told them one headlight was now completely out - it wasn't before - they said they would order the part they first said was no longer available. Over a month later, and my headlight flew out of the socket while I was on the highway! But they continue to lie. Don't trust them. I'm so sorry I did. I paid them $1500 to break my car and had to pay another $2200 for the fix - somewhere else. Why would I trust them to touch it again when all they did was lie?

plus de 5900e de dépence en 2025 chez midas lens rien ne vas HONTEUX.

Très déçu par le manque de sérieux et de transparence du garage MIDAS de Montigny-les-Cormeilles dans le Val d'Oise (95). Après trois samedis passés pour une panne présumée, aucune solution n’a été apportée une courroie supposemment changé inutilement, le bruit a persisté. Plus de 500 € facturés sans preuve de réparation et un véhicule rendu dans le même état. Aucun professionnalisme, aucune explication valable, aucune prise de responsabilité sinon le mensonge habituel d'un amateur inexpérimenté. Une expérience à fuir.

I rarely leave any reviews for a company but someone higher up as a boss in Midas needs to know this. I got my car state inspection done at Midas in February at the butler pa. Today I had the windshield replaced my insurance paid for the windshield replacement. I go into Midas in butler to explain I need a new inspection sticker on the windshield the guy at the desk threatened to call the cops on me. I told him Midas is the one inspection my car couple months ago and I have proof the windshield was just been replaced today it’s the same VIN number. My car is legally inspection. Service at Midas in butler pa facility has got really poor in the past couple months they don’t care about customers anymore

Very disappointed with . In January, my vehicle was damaged during service, and no one said a word. I only found out after it turned into a serious hub problem. When I brought it back, instead of taking full responsibility, management tried to offer about $300 plus labor for a repair caused by their shop. The part itself costs around $89. That is not accountability — that is trying to settle it as cheaply as possible after failing to disclose the damage in the first place. I was a loyal customer for years and paid cash every time. After this experience, I will not be returning. If you use , check your vehicle carefully before you leave. I trusted them, and that trust cost me time, money, and a major headache

On 11/18/2025, I visited Midas Auto Service & Tires, 1439 Plymouth Ave, Fall River, MA, to have the brakes serviced on my Mercedes‑Benz GLK250. After the repair, the “Check Brake Pad Wear” message immediately appeared on my dashboard. The manager told me they had replaced the sensors multiple times but could not clear the warning. He stated there was nothing more they could do and advised me to simply reset the message each time I started the vehicle. On 1/27/2026, I returned to Midas because several issues had developed: • Check engine light • Low coolant level warning • Low tire pressure warning • Brake pad wear message still present The manager told me my coolant was “dirty” and needed to be replaced, and that this was causing the check engine light. He also stated that all of my tire pressure monitoring sensors (TPMS) needed replacement. Later that day, he called to say that all of my lug bolts were seized, that several broke during removal, and that replacing the bolts alone would cost approximately $500. I refused this charge, and we agreed that I would purchase new bolts myself and bring them in. Midas replaced the TPMS sensors on the passenger side but stated the driver‑side sensors still needed to be replaced. After I picked up the vehicle, all of the warning lights returned. A couple of weeks later, I returned again for the remaining TPMS replacements and to have the lug bolts installed. I also informed them that the coolant light, brake pad message, check engine light, and tire pressure warning had all returned. The manager told me they had purchased a new diagnostic computer and that the check engine light was due to low DEF fluid, despite the fact that I had added a full box only days earlier. They claimed to add DEF fluid and coolant, and stated the lights went off. They then replaced the remaining TPMS sensors and installed the lug bolts I provided. I am concerned that all of the lug bolts were suddenly difficult to remove, even though Midas had no difficulty removing them during the brake service a few months earlier. Since they were the last ones to reinstall the bolts, I question whether they were cross‑threaded or improperly installed. Something does not add up. After leaving Midas, all of the warning lights returned again, except for the tire pressure message. At this point, I brought my vehicle to the Mercedes‑Benz dealership for a proper diagnosis. The Mercedes‑Benz service department informed me that: • The brake pad wear warning was caused by a severed brake wear sensor wire, which occurred due to improper routing during the brake service performed by Midas. This was documented on their invoice, and they provided photographs. • The DEF level sensor was faulty, which is why the check engine light was on. • The coolant level was low, which caused the coolant warning to reappear. I returned to Midas to speak with the manager, who told me it was “their word against the dealership’s” and refused reimbursement for the brake wire repair, which cost over $500. I then filed a complaint with Midas corporate. I was contacted by Derek Johnson, Area Director for MA and RI for Midas/AMG Enterprises. He stated that Midas was not responsible for the severed brake wire and claimed the harness was routed correctly. His explanation contradicted the dealership’s documentation and photographs. He also claimed the brake warning light was not on during either of my visits, which is not true, as the light was present immediately after the brake service and remained on throughout all subsequent visits. I originally requested reimbursement only for the brake wire repair. However, given the likelihood that the lug bolts were cross‑threaded or improperly installed during the brake service — resulting in additional parts and labor costs — I am now requesting reimbursement for those expenses as well. I am requesting a total reimbursement of $1,200, which covers: • The brake wear sensor wire replacement • The cost of replacement lug bolts • The labor associated with removing and reinstalling the damaged bolts Midas’s repeated misdiagnosis, improper workmanship, and refusal to take responsibility have caused significant inconvenience, safety concerns, and unnecessary expenses.

My name is Paul I dont really leave reviews Not really my thing . Dont even have a gmail. I am using a friends to post.stay away from midas wexford. i took my truck here for brakes . they called me the next morning telling me that my truck was leaking antifreeze all over the parking lot and that i needed a water pump at a cost of nearly 1000 dollars . Tims (manager) exact words were : my tech went outside to pull your truck in and noticed it was leaking antifreeze all over the place, it leaked a trail all over the parking lot. " I sent my girlfriend up because i could not leave work. we live 10 minutes away. There was no antifreeze where we parked it the night before, nor was there any trail of antifreeze into the building as stated by the manager 10 minutes before hand. She faced timed me as she entered the building and there was antifreeze all over the bay floor under my truck yet no antifreeze outside. I confronted tim via phone with info that my girlfriend had gathered. He stated that his tech was being dishonest about the coolant leaking out side and he didnt know how it started leaking in the building. They admitted to lying when the information gave them no other choice . Dont let them lie to you like they did to me . Filing complaints with bbb and attorney general.

HEY EVERYONE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT! "Uncured Deceptive Act" under the State Deceptive Consumer Sales Act (SDCSA)._________________m Michael-Oct 29, 2025 Midas Pacific Beach misdiagnosed my issue and upsold me parts that I did not need. They replaced the spark plugs at 45,000 miles and the manufacturer recommendation was at 105,000 miles. They did not even fix the problem<--You can sue for DEMAND FOR CURE Formal Demand for Cure TO: Manager, Midas Service Center FROM: [Your Name] DATE: April 10, 2026 RE: Notice of Deceptive Act / Demand for Refund – 2007 Toyota 4Runner To the Management of Midas: This letter serves as a formal Demand for Cure pursuant to Indiana Code § 24-5-0.5-5. I am providing notice within the required six-month window of discovering a deceptive act regarding the repair of my vehicle. 1. The Deceptive Act: On April 2026, your facility charged me $1,548.22 to replace the Engine Control Unit (ECU) and $600 for a starter. Your technicians failed to resolve or address the root cause of the electrical failure: a significant sunroof leak. By blowing the hinges off during your 'draining of the SunRoof Tubes with improper equipment, admitting "Midas doesn't work on Sunroofs, you should take it to a body Shoppe" Insisted on installing a high-value electrical component while water was actively intruding into the vehicle's electrical housing, the repair was fundamentally flawed and destined for immediate failure. Negligence: On April, 2026, a certified Toyota technician Mike Smartz inspected the vehicle and documented the following: TOYOTA INSPECTION FINDS "Tech verified sunroof is leaking causing water to intrude into the vehicle which caused ECU to fail. Found no communication with the ECM." SUE MIDAS: Had to rent a car from Airport, because AAA towed my car to dealership. SMALL CLAIMS COURT. MIDAS didn't offer a rental for over a month of service and misdiagnosis. So Rental Car was forced!!!Please be advised that a formal complaint has already been filed with the Attorney General’s Consumer Protection Division. If this matter is not resolved within 30 days, I am prepared to escalate this to small claims court to seek the refund, court costs, and potential triple damages as allowed under The Deceptive Consumer Sales Act. HEYEVERYONE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT?