Pietro
EVERYTHING OK BUT NO MT5 :/ AND 1 MLN CHALLENGE COSTS TOO MUCH…….
Perfect for the single phase rule with only 10%. The only bad things in my opinion are: the fact that there is no MT5 (PLEASE PUT IT IN!!) and then the 1 million prop costs a bit too much ... lower the price a bit please (3k would be ideal). The drawdown would be perfect if it was 8% / 10% total. For the rest everything is ok. I am waiting to buy a 1 million challenge but it costs a lot. Please fix it so you will definitely have more customers.
Response from mentfunding.comJun 6, 2025
Pietro! first of all thank you for actually taking the time to check out what we offer, to see how different it is, and to leave your personal thoughts. I hope after reading this reply you reconsider the review <3. Regarding metatrader, it doesnt necessarily come down to us to put it in or not. The regulatory environment around it, costs associated with it, the brokers we work with and their functionality - all decide whether we can offer a platform or not. We are always on the lookout for IMPROVING the platform offers, and are actually working hard right now on adding even more platform offers for our futures plan that will be more in line with our fx platforms - but this is something that we are always trying to improve but can't just randomly add. Additionally, if you sign up for some of our competitions or whatever - you will be pleasantly surprised by how useful the other platforms are/can be. So I urge you to give them a proper chance as in my opinion - they are a LOT better than meta. Regarding the 1mill - we are the only firm in the space that offers funding at this level, while being consistent with our no trailing or bullsh*t rules. We don't have to offer the 1million at all - but we choose to because our model is different, and our traders are different to the stuff thats out there. We can't randomly lower the price (especially not by over half). Regarding the drawdown, and the price, etc. - I understand that your background might be with 2 step firms, trailing drawdowns, and potentially terrible rules that Ment Funding doesnt actually have. Which means that a lot of these other firms are able to offer LARGER loss sizes AND are able to offer cheaper prices. We are a premium product and as such, we offer our products at a premium price. We also do this all under a 1-step evaluation umbrella. Which means that you get funded after passing ONE TIME, not twice, not multiple times, but 1 time. Hence, 1-step. And as a result, with no trailing drawdowns, no extra bs, we do so with a 6% max loss (which has been bumped to 6% from an initial 5% as we continue to improve our offerings and ability to offer funding). I hope you realize that we run things differently after reading this. I hope you also recognize that we are not in the space for "more customers" - we are in the space for "long-term customers" that we can establish "long-term relationships with". The 1mill isnt meant to be bought by everyone, especially if its the thought that it "costs too much" - there are other really good evaluation sizes that might work better for you. Hope you reconsider, thank you. Anton Ment Funding LLC