Le doy una estrella porque no hay posibilidad de dar menos 100
Es la peor experiencia de mi vida
De ser un sueño hecho realidad a pasado a ser una pesadilla de la cual no se cuando despertar
Son la peor versión de maltrato y desinformación del mundo
Tengo pruebas no hablo por hablar
Lo mismo el servicio de garantía que el servicio al cliente son lo peor que hay
No recomiendo a nadie comprar un Mercedes en EUA
JH
Johana H.
Stuck Paying for a Defective Mercedes EQB300 with No Solution
I am sharing my experience with Mercedes-Benz USA and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services regarding a leased 2023 EQB300 that has had ongoing and unresolved safety issues.
I leased this vehicle in December 2023. By September 2024, serious problems began — the instrument cluster (speedometer/navigation) would randomly go completely black while driving. Not a minor glitch, but a full blackout while on the road.
In November 2024, I received a “Coolant Too Hot – Stop Vehicle” warning related to the high-voltage system.
Since then, there have been multiple repair attempts:
Numerous service visits
Repeated “no issue found” responses
Full dashboard removal to replace wiring
Replacement of major components, including the MBUX system (January 2026)
Multiple software resets and updates
Despite all of this, the issue continues.
In March 2026, I was informed there is currently no fix available, and that a potential solution may come in a future software update.
In April 2026, I spent hours at the dealership trying to resolve the situation. A replacement vehicle was discussed, I even contacted my insurance to add the new car, and my Mercedes app was updated — only to be told afterward that the lease could not be canceled.
At the same time, Mercedes-Benz Financial Services formally stated that I must continue making my ~$800/month payments regardless of the condition of the vehicle.
The lease terms explicitly state that payments must continue “even if the vehicle is stolen, destroyed, or does not satisfactorily perform.” In other words, I am expected to keep paying for this car even if it is unsafe or unusable.
Additionally, every time I was given a loaner vehicle, I was required to drop everything and return it immediately upon request or risk being charged approximately $150 per day.
To make matters worse:
The vehicle is associated with a high-voltage battery recall
Charging is restricted and cannot safely be done at home
I have a minor daughter who relies on this vehicle daily
This has been an extremely stressful experience. I feel like I am being forced to drive a vehicle with known safety issues while continuing to pay full price for it.
I expected a brand like Mercedes-Benz to stand behind its product and prioritize customer safety and resolution. Unfortunately, that has not been my experience.
I hope this helps other consumers make an informed decision.
JW
Jay W.
A Mercedes-Benz Fraud--Car Sold without a Crucial Standard Security Item
I purchased my first Mercedes, a GLE 450e, last year with high expectations based on Mercedes-Benz’s reputation for luxury, reliability, and first-class customer service. Regrettably, my experience so far has turned into a complete nightmare!! After a hit-and-run accident last month, I tried to retrieve collision photos using the Guard 360—a security feature listed in the standard package on my buildsheet. However, the photos were not available at all. For the next month and a half, I had multiple calls with the sales manager at Beaverton and multiple customer service persons with Mercedes digital and customer service. I even made two trips to Mercedes dealer at Eugene and Beaverton Oregon. Despite repeated promises by the sales manager that my car was equipped with Guard 360, nobody was able to figure out why it was not functioning. A week ago, a customer service agent finally informed me that my car was not equipped with Guard 360. This is a fraud!! I was sold a product without an important and standard security feature. Now both the Beaverton Dealership and Mercedes Customer Service remain silent without even an apology! Are they expecting me to remain silent? Absolutely NOT— I am prepared to assert and defend my consumer rights fully and pursue all available legal remedies!! If you are thinking about purchasing a Mercedes, think twice after reading my experience. If you already own a recent Mercedes model, make sure to certify that your car has all the features listed on your buildsheet—apparently Mercedes no longer guarantees this!!
SA
Shakeylla A.
I traded in a functional 2020 GLC 300…
I traded in a functional 2020 GLC 300 for a 2023 on May 25, 2023 and on June 2, 2023 was the beginning of a nightmare. I reside in Arkansas and the one dealership in my area had no 2023 models so I drove to Memphis Tennessee to fulfill my desire. I have been stranded seven times due to a 12 V battery electrical system malfunction (starting 6/2/2023 at the revenue office). The dealership in Arkansas has been unable to repair (>14 service repairs) and the vehicle has not been reliable or safe enough to get back to Memphis, Tennessee. I contacted MB USA after the second time I was stranded back in 2023 and as of February 27, 2026 MBUSA has not taken the vehicle back and I am currently over $10,000 in enterprise Rent-A-Car debt. This is the fourth Mercedes that I have either leased or financed over the course of 11 years. Ridiculous!
BT
Bruce T.
I have a 2018 S450 formatic
I have a 2018 S450 formatic, and they cut my embrace from me. And I am p***** off and don't know if I am going to buy another mercedes after having them screw so many people over
DH
Dash H.
Defective Vehicle, Failed Repairs, and No Resolution from MBUSA
This review is directed at Mercedes-Benz USA (MBUSA) and how my Lemon Law case and long-term vehicle failures have been handled.
My 2024 Mercedes-Benz GLB has suffered from persistent electronic, ignition, and power-distribution failures for over one year. These issues began early in ownership and have continued despite numerous visits to authorized Mercedes-Benz dealerships, all for the same underlying defect family. Problems have included software failures, ignition malfunctions, inability to start, loss of vehicle operability, and intermittent total shutdowns.
Over the course of the first year alone, the vehicle has been out of service for more than 40 cumulative days. It has been repeatedly returned to the dealership for the same issues, with no permanent resolution.
Only in the last month short, the vehicle was declared “repaired” twice, with the dealership billing MBUSA both times. The second “repair” failed the very next day, reinforcing that the defect was never actually resolved.
On January 3rd, after months of ongoing issues, the vehicle became completely inoperable at my residence. It would not unlock, start, or respond to power. Two separate roadside assistance companies dispatched by MBUSA were unable to move the vehicle, and it had to be removed using a dolly as a dead vehicle. This incident was documented by third parties and was not an isolated event—it was the culmination of a year of recurring failures.
Despite all of this—over a year of documented issues, repeated repair attempts, and extended out-of-service time—MBUSA later denied my buyback request, stating that the vehicle was “operating as designed” and that the dealership “could not replicate the issue.” This position directly contradicts:
• The condition of the vehicle at pickup
• Roadside assistance findings
• Service advisor confirmations
• The documented repair history spanning over a year
Transportation support was also mishandled. My family was left without a vehicle for days, while lease payments and full insurance continued uninterrupted. Loaner or rental assistance was initially denied, and I was told I would need to pay for a rental myself. Only after escalation was limited assistance offered.
Most concerning was an “alternative resolution” proposed by an MBUSA executive representative named ANDREA, which suggested that I:
• Trade or sell the defective vehicle at a loss of approximately $20,000, and
• Apply a $7,000 incentive toward another Mercedes-Benz
This was not a repurchase or a statutory remedy. It was a sales pitch that shifted the financial burden of a defective vehicle onto the consumer, which I declined.
Throughout this process, MBUSA relied heavily on dealership statements that conflicted with documented facts, while dismissing a full year of recurring failures, repeated repair attempts, and substantial consumer harm. The result was delay, denial, and escalation, rather than accountability.
I expected Mercedes-Benz USA to stand behind its product and its customers. Instead, I experienced inconsistent communication, denial of responsibility, and a refusal to meaningfully resolve a vehicle that clearly failed to meet reliability expectations over an extended period of time.
After exhausting every reasonable attempt to resolve this matter directly, we now have no option but to pursue legal action.
DG
Dejan G.
Worst customer service service I have…
Worst customer service service I have ever experienced. Trying to solve my safety issue with leaking fuel line, and got hung up three times. Very disappointing in Mercedes Benz as a whole.
RM
Richard M.
Dealing with a Mercedes-Benz dealership…
Dealing with a Mercedes-Benz dealership in Parkersburg West Virginia. I took my 2005 E320 4matic them for the 25-year warranty on the SBC brake unit. It would not start because the system will not allow the engine to turn over unless it is functioning properly after Towing it to the dealership for that SVC and a no start after 10 minutes they refuse to work on it. Stating it's a piece of junk Mercedes are worth it they don't work on stuff over 10 years because they don't know how they can't get parts blah blah blah blah blah. After getting the car back to my home it would not start because of a $0.10 fuse for the starter relay. The anti-lock brake light is on in the dash and when hooking up my icarsoft mb2 scanner that will deactivate the SBC to bleed the brakes and reactivate it it it was showing codes for the SBC Hydro unit which is still under warranty and should be replaced but for some reason they will not touch the car and also it has a restriction on it which after researching means that it's out of the factory warranty like duh. The manager for that part of the dealership says the work on any older vehicles but not that one. It's a joke I would say everybody needs to get rid of their Mercedes-Benz and buy BMWs if they're going to treat their customers like crap