Lash Plus is a pioneering beauty brand founded by Kiki, an award-winning lash artist with over 15 years of global experience. Established in 2018, the brand is rooted in a commitment to innovation, safety, and professional excellence in the eyelash extension industry. Serves a growing international community of lash professionals, educators, and salon owners.
Lash Plus (lash-plus.com) has 54 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 4.4 out of 5.
Also known as
lash-plus.com
Website
lash-plus.com
Category
Cosmetics & Makeup
Listed on Five Star Index
2026
About these reviews
Replies
The company replied to 80% of reviews.
Latest
Most recent review: October 2026.
Edits
Reviews are shown as their authors wrote them. The company can reply, but cannot edit them.
Score
This company cannot pay to remove reviews or change its score.
Didn't last, and every fix meant buying again
I run a lash salon and have bought 4 LED Tweezers in total from Lash Plus.
My first unit had no foot pedal(about $300), and the button(stated as "touch sensor") was very hard to press while holding lashes. When I raised this, I was offered 20% off the newer version with a pedal, so I bought 3 more between May and November 2025, at $400–500 each.
All 3 stopped working within about a year, with 1 died within 6 months even though we handled them very carefully because of the price. The warranty is only 6 months, so 1 got a replacement and the other 2 weren't covered.
When I contacted support for the other 2, the solution was again to buy the next version, this time 50% off the LED Tweezer 2.0. The 2.0 costs over $500, so that's still around $250 per unit to replace tools that should have lasted.
Support was polite, but every answer to a problem with their product has been another purchase. If you're considering this for a busy salon, think carefully about durability and the six-month warranty before buying.
KF
Karolina F.
DONT WASTE YOUR MONEY!!!
I am extremely disappointed with both the Lash Plus LED Tweezer 2.0 and the customer service I received. Based on my experience, I would not recommend this product.
The product description advertises a Bluetooth foot pedal for hands-free operation and states that the device can operate using a Bluetooth foot pedal or a pressure sensor. However, the actual functionality does not match what I reasonably expected from the advertising and the supplied manual. Even on Setting 4, described in the manual as “Foot Pedal Only Operation”, the LED still activates through normal hand pressure.
Even more concerning, the user manual describes a “Continuous Light Activation / Permanent Mode”, claiming that double-pressing the silicone body will keep the LED illuminated continuously. This function does not work because, according to the seller, the information in the manual was incorrect. The seller has admitted this error in writing. For a specialised professional device costing hundreds of pounds, this is simply unacceptable. Customers should be able to rely on the product documentation when purchasing expensive equipment.
The overall experience has been extremely frustrating. After discovering these issues, I contacted customer support and requested a refund within 30 days of delivery. I have exchanged approximately ten emails with the company, attempting to resolve the matter reasonably. Instead of offering a satisfactory solution, the seller continues to refuse a refund unless I return the device to Malaysia at my own expense.
I have already paid approximately £80 in import charges, and returning the product internationally would involve further costs and uncertainty. The company appears unwilling to take responsibility for providing inaccurate product information and an instruction manual containing functionality that does not exist.
For a product marketed to professional lash artists, I expected accurate advertising, reliable functionality, clear documentation and professional after-sales support. Unfortunately, my experience has fallen far short of these expectations.
The misleading product information, incorrect manual, disappointing product experience and unsatisfactory customer service have made this a very poor purchase. What is particularly frustrating is not just the product itself, but the company’s unwillingness to resolve the issue fairly after acknowledging its own mistake.
I would strongly advise other lash artists to carefully consider these issues before purchasing. I certainly would not buy this product again.
Response from Lash PlusOct 18, 2026
Thank you for sharing your feedback. However, several important details in your review are inaccurate or presented without the necessary context.
Firstly, you did not purchase the Lash Plus LED Tweezer 2.0. You purchased the original 1.0 model. Your review repeatedly refers to a product you did not purchase, which is misleading to other customers.
Secondly, no product defect was established. You had the device for 29 days and had been using it in your professional salon before requesting a full refund. We asked you to return the system so that we could inspect it, assess its functionality and determine whether any genuine defect existed. You did not agree to return the product.
Regarding the documentation, we acknowledged that there was an error in one section of the manual. However, the correct functionality was explained in approximately seven to nine other locations throughout the documentation. Your review focuses exclusively on this single inconsistency while overlooking the numerous places where the operation was correctly described.
Importantly, the manual containing this error was not available to you before your purchase, so it could not have influenced your original purchasing decision, despite your review suggesting otherwise.
We take documentation accuracy seriously and acknowledged the mistake. However, an isolated documentation error does not automatically establish that a working product is defective or justify retaining it while demanding a full refund.
You also raised concerns about international shipping costs. We understand these costs can be frustrating, but we also incur substantial shipping and fulfilment expenses when delivering products to customers. In fact, we offer duties-paid international shipping to help make the purchasing experience more straightforward.
We have exchanged numerous emails with you and invested considerable time attempting to reach a reasonable resolution. At no point did we simply dismiss your concerns or refuse to investigate them. We requested the most basic and reasonable step in resolving a product dispute: returning the device for inspection.
What you were ultimately requesting was a full refund for a product you had used in your salon for 29 days, without returning it or allowing us to inspect it.
That is simply not a reasonable or sustainable expectation of any business. Companies cannot continue to manufacture, ship and support professional equipment if customers can use products for weeks, request their entire purchase price back and retain the equipment without any verification or return process.
We are absolutely committed to supporting our customers and taking responsibility when something genuinely goes wrong. But that responsibility must be balanced with a fair and reasonable process for both parties.
We remain willing to assess the device through the appropriate return and inspection process. However, expecting a full refund while retaining a used product, without establishing a defect or permitting an inspection, is not a reasonable resolution.
We stand behind our products, our customer service and our willingness to resolve legitimate concerns. We simply ask that reviews present the complete circumstances accurately, including the product actually purchased and the reasonable steps offered to resolve the matter.
Lash Plus
AL
Ayumi L.
I’m quite disappointed that LED…
I’m quite disappointed that LED tweezers(AUD$453) has developed a fault within only 7 months of use. For a professional tool, I would expect it to last much longer than this, especially considering the price.
However they offer me to upgrade new 2.0 tweezers. I’m not comfortable paying an additional USD $99 for an upgrade when my current LED tweezer has already developed a fault within only 7 months of use.
I also have an Instagram message from a friend who is a fellow lash technician, in which she shared her experience with the LED Tweezer and told me that her device had also stopped working.
I can provide a screenshot of our conversation if required.
Because of this, I’m not comfortable upgrading to the 2.0, especially when I’ve already had an issue with my current one after only around 7 months of very light use.
To be honest, this has made me concerned about the reliability and durability of the product. I would be hesitant to spend another USD $99 on a product when I’m not confident that it will last much longer.
Just sharing my experience so other lash artists can be aware before purchasing.
Definitely something to consider if you’re investing in an LED tweezer for professional use.
Response from Lash PlusOct 9, 2026
Thank you for sharing your feedback.
While we understand that you may not be satisfied with our warranty policy, these terms are clearly published and available for customers to review before purchasing. Our policies are applied consistently to all customers.
We have offered you reasonable solutions, including the opportunity to return your device for inspection so we can determine whether the reported issue was caused by a manufacturing defect, accidental damage, or another factor. We also offered a heavily discounted upgrade to our latest LED Tweezer 2.0 as an alternative. Unfortunately, you have chosen not to accept either option, which is entirely your decision.
However, declining the solutions offered does not mean that Lash Plus has failed to provide support or meet its obligations.
We must also address the inaccurate and potentially misleading statements contained in your review, particularly the allegations regarding another customer's supposed experience. These third-party claims have not been substantiated and cannot be independently verified. We take the publication of potentially false or misleading information about our business seriously, and these concerns have been escalated to our legal and policy team for review.
We respect your right to express dissatisfaction and share your personal experience. However, publishing a negative review does not change our warranty policies or the terms that were available at the time of purchase. Like other businesses, we operate under established terms and procedures to ensure customers are treated fairly and consistently. It would be unreasonable to expect us to disregard those procedures simply because a customer disagrees with them.
Our offer to inspect your device remains open, and we are happy to assist you through the appropriate process. However, we cannot make a determination about the cause of a reported fault without first examining the product.
Lash Plus Commercial Team
Before investing in the Lash Plus LED Tweezer Expert Kit, I encourage professionals to carefully consider not only the products, but also the company's after-sales support and warranty policies.
Here's what happened to me:
In Nov 2025, I purchased the Lash Plus LED Tweezer Expert Kit during the Black Friday sale for AUD $643.50. The website displayed prices in USD, yet my payment was processed in AUD, with my bank statement showing "SP LASH PLUS FL." I took advantage of the sale because I believed I was investing in a premium professional system backed by quality products & after-sales support.
The LED Tweezer was used exclusively in my low-volume salon & maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's care instructions. Less than seven months after purchase—just 27 days after the company's six-month warranty expired—the sensor pad malfunctioned, rendering the device unusable. I contacted Lash Plus immediately & supplied video evidence.
The initial response focused on troubleshooting & possible handling or usage causes rather than arranging an inspection. Although I reported the issue immediately & supplied video evidence, I was not initially asked to return the device.
After further correspondence with the co-founder, I was advised that a refund or complimentary replacement would not be provided because the device was outside the company's six-month warranty. I was subsequently asked to return the device to Malaysia for assessment & was offered a replacement for USD $99 as a goodwill gesture. During the same correspondence, I was advised that if I believed I was entitled to a remedy under Australian Consumer Law, I was welcome to lodge a complaint with NSW Fair Trading, NCAT or another appropriate authority. I subsequently lodged a complaint with NSW Fair Trading, where the matter remains part of the formal dispute resolution process.
At every stage, I responded promptly, supplied video evidence, followed the requested troubleshooting & agreed to an inspection. My only request was for either a prepaid international shipping label or an Australian return option so I would not have to bear the costs & risks of international shipping, including the possibility of the device being delayed, damaged or lost in transit, as it was the key evidence of the reported fault. We were ultimately unable to reach an agreement.
This was not my first issue. An unopened bottle of Aqua LED Glue had completely cured solid despite remaining unopened and being stored in accordance with the manufacturer's care instructions. After supplying video evidence, I was advised it fell outside the company's one-month adhesive policy & that I would need to purchase another bottle.
Products can sometimes fail. My disappointment was not simply that they did, but the outcome after I reported both issues promptly, supplied supporting evidence, cooperated throughout the process, & attempted to reach a practical resolution.
This experience also highlighted the company's relatively short warranty periods. In my opinion, a six-month warranty for a premium professional electronic tool, together with a one-month policy for professional adhesive, is something prospective buyers should carefully consider.
This review reflects my genuine personal experience. The quality of after-sales support can be just as important as the quality of the product itself, and I encourage other professionals to consider both before making a similar investment.
Response from Lash PlusJul 31, 2026
Hi Jennifer,
Thank you for your feedback.
We apologise for your disappointment regarding the outcome of your recent requests. However, we would like to clarify several important points.
You purchased the Lash Plus LED Tweezer Expert Kit, which includes multiple products and services: the LED Tweezer, professional LED glues, a remover, tweezers, a lash tray, online education, digital certification, and additional supporting materials. Please note that all the products in your kit were opened and used.
The issue with the LED Tweezer was reported after the standard 6-month warranty period had expired. While we do not believe a full refund or complimentary replacement is justified, we did offer a reduced-cost replacement option as a courtesy. Additionally, we extended an offer for a free repair if the item is returned.
Regarding the Aqua LED Glue, your request for a replacement came two months after you received the product. Please remember that professional adhesives have a limited shelf life, so expecting an automatic replacement under these circumstances is quite unexpected.
Our policies concerning warranties, returns, adhesives, and product care are clearly outlined on our website and were available to you prior to your purchase. We enforce these policies consistently, regardless of the tone of communication we receive from customers.
You mentioned that you are addressing this issue through NSW Fair Trading and NCAT. We are prepared to respond through the appropriate channels. We firmly believe that your claim is not valid, no matter how the situation is presented.
We regret that we were unable to reach the outcome you desired, but our position remains unchanged. Fortunately, cases like this are rare.
Best regards,
Lash Plus
KM
KM
Cheap Quality
I am extremely dissatisfied.
I won’t buy it again.
日本の会社だからとても期待して購入したが、開けたらバックからすでに安っぽく(ダンボールも雑な感じ)、とっても残念でした。
フットペダルは電池必要。
グルーは使ってないので評価はなしです。
Response from Lash PlusFeb 27, 2026
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback.
We genuinely stand behind the quality and engineering of our products, and we take all concerns seriously. However, we must respectfully clarify several important points.
Our LED Tweezer system is not a generic product. It is a patented device developed over several years, with specific engineering requirements including an internal support structure, pressure sensor calibration, certified electronic components, and safety compliance standards. The materials used are selected for functionality, safety, and professional durability — not cosmetic appearance alone.
Regarding your comments:
• The carrying case is designed for lightweight portability and international shipping efficiency. We have not previously received feedback suggesting chemical odor or structural failure, but we will investigate it.
• The silicone sleeve is medical-grade and designed specifically for grip, insulation, and hygiene. It has been tested for repeated professional use in salons internationally. Furthermore, all of our materials are tested and certified by international compliance testing organisations.
• The included branded materials are optional and intended to support marketing for technicians who choose to use them. They do not impact the core device performance.
• The manual is professionally printed and translated for clarity and safety compliance. If yours was misprinted, that would be unusual, and we would want to review it. Digital copies are also provided.
We also want to clarify our refund policy. As clearly stated at the time of purchase, used professional devices are not eligible for cash refunds due to hygiene and compliance regulations. We do offer store credit in line with our published policy. This is standard practice for many professional-use beauty tools. Would you ask for a refund for a used toothbrush?
Comparing a patented, safety-tested device to low-cost marketplace products is simply not accurate. The internal components, curing calibration, compliance standards, and product support are entirely different categories.
We respect that not every product is the right fit for every technician. However, we do not believe it is fair to suggest the product is equivalent to mass-produced marketplace items when significant R&D, certification, and testing have gone into its development.
If you would like to discuss your concerns directly with us, we remain available via email.
We wish you all the best in your business.
YP
Yuka P.
DO NOT recommend this brand
They sent me faulty one TWICE.
I asked for a full refund but they refused…
Don’t waste time and money on this brand
Response from Lash PlusAug 12, 2025
We’re sorry you experienced issues with your product. After the fault, we sent a replacement at no cost. We offered either our newest LED Tweezer upgrade or a refund for the device (as outlined in our returns policy).
We’d still be happy to resolve this for you — please reach out so we can finalise your preferred option.
JN
Just not H.
Waste of money
The glue is thick, it won't cure and it's a waste of money. I wanted to love it but I don't.
Response from Lash PlusJul 2, 2025
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. I'm really sorry to hear you haven't had a great experience with the glue.
It sounds like you selected our cyanoacrylate-free glue, which is specifically formulated for clients with extreme sensitivities. Because it’s quite different from traditional LED lash adhesives, it does require a modified application technique, which we explain in detail on our website. That said, we completely understand that not everyone has time to read through all the product guidance before purchasing.
We want every lash artist to feel confident with our products, and while this particular glue may not have been the right fit for you, many of our other glues have received overwhelmingly positive feedback. If you’re open to it, we’d love for you to try one of those instead—we think you’ll have a much better experience.
While it’s disappointing to receive a one-star review based on one specialized product, we truly appreciate your honesty and hope you’ll give us another chance in the future.
Warm regards,
Lash Plus