Dodgers3
Not represented properly- I Was Rear ended
I was rear ended while sitting still and waiting for a passing train. The other party accepted liability and the police report indicated the same. I hired this firm and was not allowed to speak to the attorney until I posted a negative Yelp Review. I was then contacted directly by the attorney and asked to remove the review and I did because I could not have him working on my best interest while I was reviewing him negatively. He promised to do a better job and I believed him. The Managing attorney of the firm did not speak to me for nearly an entire year after this. I did everything that the Law Firm asked of me with one exception. I refused to continue treatment after I felt that I was no longer injured. I informed the firm, that I was feeling better and wanted to settle my case. I was told that I needed more treatment to make this, "Worth their while". I was further informed that if I did a bit more treatment that the firm would get me more money. I informed them that I had reached my goal of healing. On September 21st 2017 I spoke with the Managing attorney about the filing options on my case and he indicated that he would file a lawsuit if I wanted. I affirmed that I wanted a lawsuit filed. He blew my statute of limitations (November 8th 2017) and then doctored up paper work and sent me unsigned documents as though he had dropped my case legitimately. This office indicated that it had paid my medical bills on December 4th of 2017 and indicated that he would prepare a settlement offer for me to put the matter behind us. The settlement offer was for $400. In March of 2018 this company mailed letters claiming to have dropped my case back in September of 2017. I am now receiving bills from the medical vendors he was supposed to have paid even until this date. As I look at these sequence of events I see that this amounts to the poorest service I have ever received in anything I have ever been involved with in my life. On my current review the attorney stated that, "We're sorry that we couldn't handle your case but unfortunately, sometimes there are cases where people are listed at fault and have no case, which we cannot help out." The central suggestion is being that I was at fault. Why else would such a statement be made? I was rear ended and my damage was paid for by the other insurance company. Why suggest this then cover it with "This may or may have not been the issue in your case." The firm knew this was not the decision in my case when they accepted it. I can be reached at 9162171414