HomeListerReviews of homelister.com

Pay me commession

Well I be immensely happy if all that I have heard lately is the truth about this platform

Good evening sir please I will like to work with you in trading i have 3 years experience

Vous devriez être efficace en répondant à toutes les questions qu'on vous posent

Good. I just love it!

Looking into this for me and my partner, wish we considered it 10 years ago to be honest.

Would recommend they helped me list my home before I moved. Smooth and easy and helped sell my house faster.

I sold my home in Hamden in Delaware County, NY through Homelister. Possessing the expertise of a licensed listing agent, the process was easy for me, but Homelister optionally fills gaps such as arranging property photos even if a seller is not positioned to manage all aspects of the selling process without assistance. Homelister is used less than traditional brokerage firms possibly because sellers are convinced they need more infrastructure. They really don't. It takes some time but it's worth it. I appreciated the help of Homelister's customer service manager, Linda, who intervened in the beginning to ensure top-flight customer service. Towards the end customer service lost some vigor, but traditional firms rarely provide anything close to "full service." Homelister is prescient and proactive in tapping into the need for and offering an alternative to the inequitable commissions that sellers pay when using traditional real estate firms. Should I buy and then sell again, I plan to use Homelister again and recommend it. It's a no-brainer that paying less than a 6% real estate commission is preferable than this inordinate percentage of the sale price. It's not a given that asking prices have 6% commissions baked into them; the 6% fee paid by a seller simply reduces the seller's proceeds, half of which loss goes to a buyer's agent who works at odds with the seller's interests. In my case, I provided services to the buyer that the buyer's agents needed to provide, plus I paid the buyer's commission. These days with all the public real estate platforms available, the buyer is conducting searches and finds properties of interest themselves more often than not and calls an agent to set up a viewing, rather than the buyer's agent doing a comprehensive search and sending the buyer listings. My buyer found my property from the listing that Homelister launched. Homelister's reasonable flat fees make the commission more equitable for the seller. I think the buyer should pay the buyer's commission since they're the one being served. I did experience my buyer's broker communicating with homelister and he should have been ignored by Homelister as his interference was improper. He felt since there isn't a "traditional" listing agent that he should work directly with Homelister. I was 100% the listing agent. Buyer's agents don't understand this. Homelister provides the seller a portal to enable the seller to put out what the traditional listing agent puts out directly on the MLS and after editing and acceptance the portal content feeds it to an MLS. The interference of the buyer side was the only problem I had but I was able to manage it. On balance, I'd say mine was a 5-star experience.