Blueprint LSAT PreparationReviews of blueprintprep.com

Update: I have now spoken with representatives at Blueprint and I do believe they are working to make the class better. They have taken down offensive videos and are working on the tech bugs throughout the system. In addition, they are now required to offer LawHub through their subscription, which will give students access to all the practice tests through LSAC. Original Review: The Blueprint online anytime course is overpriced and overrated. The course is riddled with technological problems - cut off words, lack of video explanations when one is clearly referenced, and more than a few typos - that are ridiculous for the amount of money that the course costs. On top of that, I found there to be radically too few practice tests you can attempt on the platform. I had access to nowhere near the amount of practice tests that I needed to improve my score, and had to find more elsewhere. The videos lessons themselves are full of bad, and sometimes insensitive, jokes. All of this really took away from my study experience, and I find myself 7 months down the line and with no real improvement in my LSAT score. I wanted to share this experience because I was very swayed to go with Blueprint after reading so many good reviews, but after the experience I had, I would not use it again if I could go back. I feel that Blueprint takes advantage of stressed out students who are willing to pay the big bucks for a good LSAT prep platform, but does not deliver a course worthy of over $200+/month.

I loved the online courses because they were interactive and helpful in terms of getting me more accumulated to taking the digital LSAT. However, I was extremely in satisfied with the in person classes. I did not like the war the instructors taught the course. While they tried to used engaging interdisciplinary approaches to teaching the lesson plan, it was just not the same caliber as the instructors used to teach the online courses. The online courses, in conjunction with Nelson Prep did however really helped increase my score substantially.

Teacher selection was poor. I did not think my teacher was good at teaching. I know he was young and thus probably didn't have any special experience teaching but still, it definitely was one of the factors why I didn't do as well as I could have in the class.

The online instructors were very good. The in-class instructor was good and knowledgeable as well. For LR, Blueprint was decent. I got more exposure to the flaw types, timing, and overall understanding of the section. Their method got me down a few points, and the majority of the value I got from the class showed itself in this section. For RC, Blueprint explained the general outline of how to approach RC, but I was never quite able to get a good grasp on the section. Blueprint useful for this section in a holistic sense, but less so in how to really lower my score on the section. All Blueprint did for LG was expose me to more games, I could have got that service from any other company. Overall, Blueprint did raise my score a few points, but the major growth I got on the LSAT came in the months after the course. The class can be worth the money, but I think there could also be better uses of the money for LSAT prep on the market.