Blueprint LSAT PreparationReviews of blueprintprep.com

I was with Blueprint LSAT for about 2 years. I kept renewing it/extensions. The online portal is very user friendly. However, the content and teaching style though appears to be wonderful but when it actually comes to score increase it’s doesn’t foster significant results. I would recommend JD-Next as a test/program alternative.

I was so disappointed in this course. I took the Blueprint 170 plus course with Dylan and Marie, took 10 hours of tutoring with Dylan, and extended my subscription for an additional 3 months and only saw a 7 point increase. I did over 3,000 questions, watched/attended all the lecture videos, watched/attended over 20 office hours and completed multiple exams. I averaged between 15-20 hrs a week studying for about 6 months and never saw any major improvement. I'm honestly not sure what I paid for with such a marginal increase. If I had come close to 170 I would be more understanding but I didn't and after the amount of work I put in, for as long as I did, according to their method, I expected a lot more. There was never any accountability to ensure I was improving. Never any instruction that lead to major improvement. It was as if their ultimate solution was to keep subscribing. If I could redo this process I would absolutely go with a different program and recommend you do the same.

Joined a free course and they ran a contest for a free course- I "won" it but then they ended up giving it away to someone else because they didnt catch they guessed the number that won first. Fine, no worries, totally understand. Then scheduled an appt during my only lunch break today to get a personalized tutor 2x a week, and they didnt even bother to show up. For the price, get someone who actually cares because they clearly dont

AWFUL experience. no video explanations for easier logic games. A lot of the RC had no videos either. Modules spend a whole lot of time making jokes than teaching content... i have not paid thousands of dollars to hear lame sex jokes lol. Incompetent customer support team. No place for blind review. No place to view all the prep tests and their explanations in one place. I wish I never wasted over five months of my time with this course and switched to a better one I am currently enrolled with sooner. Would NEVER recommend this course.

In my opinion, the Blueprint course was okay since it provided you with material to practice but examples in the video did not reflect the level of difficulty need to be mastered. I recommend reading the higher score guarantee before enrolling. I would not recommend this course!

Where to begin... As far as the services provided through Blueprint, you would be MUCH better off going through a different service. Why? Blueprint is extremely limited. For example, they do not offer all the Prep Exams offered through Law Hub (a mandatory subscription if you use Blue Print), so you are extremely limited on the number of prep test you can take. If you wish to do a blind review, well too bad! Because in order to clear the correct answers, you must delete your progress, which deletes the analytics. Speaking of analytics, if you are like me, and you love having spreadsheets of data for tracking progress or spotting areas of weakness, you are going to have your work cut out for you. Not only do they not allow you to easily export your test data but, if you enter your data in another platform and review with the Law Hub answer sheet, you will soon find that Blue Print does not use the actual Law Hub tests, so your correct answers will be drastically different. They choose not to use the provided experimental portion for some reason. Finally, if you have accommodations, this is not a great resource. You cannot print the tests if you have a written test accommodation. The reason for this, I believe is because if you printed out the test you would see the glaring differences in their test and the one offered through Law Hub. Next, the site has so many bugs. You cannot access homework from the calendar (where it is listed as a link), you have to go to the syllabus. When you contact support about the issue, you will probably get some response like, "yeah, that's an issue we've known about". My registration for the course has changed and been removed several times, with no solution after many attempts to take with support about the issue. Now, let's get to the practice questions and exams, the platform blueprint uses is clunky (even the instructors say not to use the features because, they do not work well). However, when I take practice exams on other sites and on Law Hub, these features (highlighting, underlining, changing font) all work seamlessly. Going further on the lack of features, you do not have a place to take notes as you watch videos and attend classes. It's a small feature offered elsewhere that really helps for active listeners. Finally, not all the answers have explanations (which for not having all the exams, this is really disappointing). If all of these things were not offered for less money on other services (7Sage), I would not be as upset because I would have nothing to compare it to. I think that Blueprint, based on the price point relies on others not having multiple services to compare to. Now regarding the classes, the instructors are fine and helpful for the class. However, most instructors have only taken the actual LSAT once and taken it years ago prior to changes made. They are not knowledgeable about the LSAT as it is currently, which poses some problems. I would also like to note that classes are all 2.5 hours (or longer) with a 5 minute break. Being someone who is in the working world too, I know that even grown adults stop paying attention in meetings and conferences at certain points even when they are actively trying to stay on task. Why? That structure of long periods of time of people talking at you, just aren't always effective. It would be incredible if they had options for people who prefer 45-60 minute sessions and meet more frequently than once a week. It may be helpful to retain information from the last class and keep students actively engaged throughout the class, instead of them asking, when can we have our measly 5 minute break?! Now, office hours, again, they are over 2 hours. Now, as a former college student who frequently attended office hours, it was supplemental and accordingly was not the same duration of an actual class. Office hours have a set subject matters, but the first 20-45 minutes goes to open questions, which is fine if there is not a topic at hand that you wanted to learn more about, but if your on a time crunch, it would maybe be best to get to the material first and then Q&A after? Just saying. Another option would be to have specific chats for general office hours. Finally on the note of instructors. Many of the videos have one of three instructors. One of which who doesn't seem to even work there anymore as they are on several Magoosh videos and even have their own prep course. This instructor is very direct and detailed, if you like their style, I would say just use magoosh (it costs so much less) and/or use their tutoring services. Overall in my research I have found that the best value is with 7Sage. They let you use and export data, they have all tests, and have a great networking ability to create and join study groups (none of this is offered at BP for over double the cost). Choose Wisely.

Blueprint is a good way to learn about the fundamentals of the LSAT, and has useful material. My instructor was Dash in NYC. Dash was a subpar instructor at best, he failed to understand that each student learns differently. He taught based on the styles of a few students in the class, all of whom were scoring over 170 on their practice tests. While the material and website was awesome, the implementation of the material was terrible. By the way, Blueprint should implement a strict policy which doesn’t allow jorts, sleeveless shirts/tank tops (imagine looking at 7inch long armpit hair and sunburns for 4 hours each class), weird hairstyles and terrible standup comedy about his “gay” interactions with other “papi’s”. Hopefully such a policy will allow students to take your program more seriously and in turn won’t write reviews as such.

Vulgar vulgar