Sakib I.
I bought this service one month ago and…
Start of February I was very excited, felt like I was going to get a guaranteed pass. Purchased myself a 50k account, whole process cost me around $350. At the time the investment felt like nothing because of all the high reviews, it felt like I was going into something reliable and low risk. At the beginning they ask for the link of the rules. Honestly, they do not bother reading it at all — pretty useless sending it, which you will understand later. There were two problems. First, risk management. I was very lucky. They had a trade that lost $998, basically 2%. If there was just $2 more slippage my account would have been breached instantly. If any trader or bot is losing 2% on a single trade, that is very poor risk management — especially when this service is meant to be a safe option. Second, they did not read the rules. I asked them if E8 Markets was fine, they said yes, and I sent them the link of my package rules. My account then got breached because of dynamic drawdown. If they had actually read the FAQ, this could have been avoided, or they could have told me the job was not possible. I lost my account in March, which makes it worse because I passed another account on my own during that time. If you want to be stuck passing a prop firm for months or even a year with no guarantee, this is the place for you. A lot of fake looking reviews as well. Go and click the 5-star reviews — a lot of them are from accounts with only 1 review, which looks very suspicious. Then read the 1-star reviews, they all follow the same pattern: accounts lost, poor communication, no refunds. I’m not saying they cannot pass challenges at all, but honestly it feels like heads or tails. They claim an 82% pass rate, but there is no real proof of that. Showing “passed challenges” at the top which are passed within a day or a couple of days means nothing if accounts are actually taking months or even a year. It’s very misleading. The only reason I trusted this service was because of refund transparency. But now they say they don’t do refunds. So if you’re reading this before signing up, just understand you are basically putting your account on heads or tails. The longest you might have to wait could be months or even a year, just to have a 50/50 chance of passing — and you may not receive a refund at all. I had to fight my way for a refund. In the end they said they would refund me, then they said it would be processed at the start of next month because of their “payroll team”. Now we are in April and I’m still waiting, with no reply to my emails. It honestly makes me look like a fool. I even emailed asking where my refund is — no response. Thankfully I found another service similar to this, but it’s free. They only take 30% from your first payout, and if they fail, they fully refund. That’s what I call a proper service — safe, transparent, and they pass accounts in less than 2 weeks. I also found a Discord server with a similar bot but even better, completely free, with proper risk management and much faster results. So just be careful. If you’re happy with a 50/50 chance of passing your account, then this is the place. I will remove this review if I receive my refund. If you are reading this, I hope I saved you from making the same mistake. They will likely respond with a long message trying to defend themselves, but from my experience this is not a reliable service. There are many better and even free options out there. If they claim 82% win rate prove it make discord server show your transparency my response to the wepasschallenge to message The FXBook you share shows no losses, which is unrealistic, and it stops around July 2025. That raises questions. It looks selective — only the good parts are shown — so it cannot be used as proof of a “safe” system. From 2022 to May 2024 (pages 1–4), most journals show accounts passed within a day or a few days. That contradicts your current claim of slow, safe trading over 1–3 months. These pages also show high-risk/HFT-style trades generating 10–30% in a single day, which is not “safe” trading. So pages 1–4 are not valid evidence. On page 5, there are only a few (around 4) journals showing more realistic trading, and only two reach typical prop targets (8–10%). That’s a very small sample. In conclusion, with 53 Trustpilot reviews, there is less than ~3–4% meaningful evidence supporting your claims. Regarding my account: it was a $25k E8 Markets account. Even if there was a misunderstanding, losing 4% on a single trade is very poor risk management. This should have been prevented, especially since I provided the FAQ and claiming to be "Successful"with E8 I have full proof — including the $998 loss certificate, purchase records, and email confirmation of a refund promised for April 1st. Since then, no response. Email Fxsakibislam@ gmail dot com if you want to see the word document
Response from WePassChallenges - Challenge Passing ServicesApr 14, 2026
We’re sorry for the frustration this caused. First, we did issue your full refund, and we apologize for the delay. The hold-up happened because you requested we also cover your challenge fee on top of refunding our service — essentially asking for a completely risk-free experience. That’s not something we can offer. Regarding the 4% drawdown: We completely understand it looks risky if you’re looking from the outside. However, we have our own proven system with detailed backtested stats. Our data shows that once a trade hits roughly 3.5% drawdown, it wins approximately 8–9 times out of 10. That’s why we let it run — because we trade based on our own statistics and edge, not conventional risk rules that most traders follow. If we traded the way the 99% trades, we’d be in the same results as everyone else. As for our MyFXBook accounts, we intentionally don’t update them frequently. In the past, when we publicly posted fresh challenge passes, prop firms noticed the account names and banned those clients or denied their payouts. We made the decision to protect our customers’ accounts rather than keep posting new results. We appreciate all feedback, but we stand by our process and statistics.



