University Of OptionsReviews of universityofoptions.com

University of Options Review: I have been a part of University of Options for 3 years. I have found that Dan and every member of his team have been willing to help me with any questions I may have. The only issue that I have had was me and my mindset. I had to determine what type of trader that I wanted to be and take it slow as there are several opportunities with the University of Options program. In using the system taught and doing the backtesting of trades as recommended I have found it to work very well. In following the various programs that are offered I know that the wins with the spread trades, swing trades, options, and futures are all real as I see the wins posted by members and their comments. I know that Dan continually works to improve his system as he truly cares about people winning. I would recommend his system to anyone who is willing to do the work and really work on their mindset as that has been the key for me.

The service did not work for me at this time, but Dan was fair. He honored my request for cancellation and a refund. I hope for the best at UOO.

I signed up for UOO in early June 2024 with a cost of $4,000 as a new trader I discovered the learning curve with this program was steeper than I originally thought. I was familiar with Dan after following him for 10+ yrs in the mortgage industry, he always came across as honest and straightforward. Shortly after signing up with UOO I was approached to joining their replicator program for the cost of another $4,000. The replicator program was pitched by Dan and it would allegedly copy Dan's trades and required no knowledge from the user. Dan showed charts with his amazing Win rate vs. losses. Dan made it sound like it was a very low if any risk. Shortly after joining the program proved to have significant shortfalls and Dan's amazing trade record proves to be much less successful than what he had been saying. Dan attributed his low "win" rate to the pressure of so many people depending on his trades. After a few months of losses and software glitches Dan was bringing in a Wall Street rader with an amazing track record and actually showed this investor making 5 digits winning trades on a daily basis with very few losses. Should have known better when the trades name was not fully disclosed, the trader now incharge started going under different names jis primary name was Jon (no last name) to protect his identity. The losses became even greater under Jon. There was no communication other then the very rate we are working on th esystem and it's going to "amazing". Suddenly Jon disappeared and the trades were being done by Dan or someone in UOO. A short later Dan has a "telegram" meeting with members and said that Jon turned out to be an alleged con-man who was trying to steal his technology and allegedly took some of Dan's money. New traders were introduced, Keith and George. The software kept getting improved and finally appeared to be market ready about 9 months after it was first declared market ready. Keith and George had what appeared to be a good trading record and after testing the improved software Dan , Keith and George held a conference call and declared all issues solved. Dan even went to the extent of recommending a couple of trade duplicators to increase the size of each trade . Shortly after that call the trades once again started experiencing significantly more losses than gains. The Gains would be minimal and the losses would be major losses. It appears the George was no longer in the picture, yet there was no announcement that th e"successful " trading team had disolved and now Keith was the sole Trader. To this date Keith's trading success is by far overshadowed by his losses. The days the Keith has a win the wins are minimal and the other days the losses ate sometimes up to 10X the days he experiences a win. the communication is extremely lacking. Dan is a great salesman and probably thinks that he has done everything up and up. In 2024 I lost #16,000 in actual trade losses and also paid $8,000 for the opportunity to lose the money. In 2025 I have already lost over $5,000. I keep believing the "snake oil" pitch that the program can be a supplement to income. I am aware that investing involves a risk of loss, I just believe that the program was way over promised, the traders were not and are not the quality of traders that Dan represented. Now Dan has a new solution an AI driven trader, apparently Dan is conceding that the current trader Keith is not capable and is now opting for an AI solution. Yet with all these issues and members continually losing money, they still are advertising and trying to bring in more unsuspecting members. Hopefully members will get lucky and the AI solution actually turns out to be profitable, or at least not a major loser.

My experience as a student at UOO over the past two years has truly been a journey of growth and learning. When I first began, I didn’t know the difference between a put and a call. Fortunately, Dan has served as an excellent mentor throughout this process. His comprehensive video training library provided valuable resources to help me build my foundational knowledge. In addition to Dan’s mentorship, his team has consistently demonstrated a positive attitude and an unwavering willingness to help. They are always available and ready to lean in whenever support is needed. Like many traders, I have experienced both the highs and lows that come with trading. The growing pains are an inevitable part of the journey, but with dedication and a lot of seat time, I found that the necessary tools for success are available at UOO. Ultimately, as with any business venture, the results are directly related to the effort you put in. The more you dedicate yourself, the more you stand to gain from this experience.

My experience has been mostly good. The morning futures trade room with Vanessa and Keith has been great for me. I've learned how to trade futures over the last year, mostly by just listening to Vanessa, and I now I have over 10 funded prop accounts plus my cash account has grown significantly. While the replicator has not been great, Dan in my opinion, has been upfront and honest about it and they are constantly looking to improve it.

I wish there is a lower rate these guys are not serious

I've read all the complaints here and can confirm my experience was the same. Dan sold a product that wasn't ready for market and over hyped his "trading experts". There should be no question that refunds are due but instead it's apparently just crickets. These guys can put together a good product and recover from this if they do the right thing.

Do NOT trust this organization. They have zero integrity. I'm being forced to file in small claims court to receive a refund for a product they sold that they readily admit didn't work. They don't even respond to refund requests. There's zero live human support. I'm of the belief that they take your money to fund the development of the tools they just sold you that aren't yet ready for show time.