Raiwser K.
most of the stuff written on there is…
most of the stuff written on there is horribly inaccurate
thegamer.com is listed under Media & Information.
thegamer.com (thegamer.com) has 27 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 1.3 out of 5.
Is this your business?
Correct your details and reply to customers in public. Both are free.
Claim this listing27 approved reviews, newest moderated first
Raiwser K.
most of the stuff written on there is horribly inaccurate
rotfl A.
Resigned from browsing that page at all because all the additional _1587_ partners need to be scrolled through - many of them (in the lower half) are ON by default! Horrible experience, go f yourself, "thegaymer.com"
Steven K.
TheGamer.COM is gaming urnalism at its finest. It is more/less up there along with IGNnorant, PC Lamer, etc. This site HATES gamers by writing an article about them (search for it on Google/Startpage). TheGamer.COM can improve by NOT hating on gamers, and reversing course on ALL of their decisions. Unfortunately, it will be a COLD DAY in HELL before any of this happens.
Dan
Nothing but bias writing... For example the recent dragon age. Most people are commenting on the poor writing and haven't even mentioned woke crap. Yet these people seem intent to call it "woke review bombing"... no, I've played the game I don't care about woke stuff I care about good story telling and the writing in this game is cringe at best... "Thegamer" is full of activist writers who insult people for having different opinions to themselves... Kind of ironic really. Avoid them at all costs.
Mister J.
Misleading articles, misleading titles.
P O.
I use The Gamer website for gaming guides. I love gaming but I'm 100% the guy who goes after Story Mode completions and I get frustrated when I get stuck on levels. The Gamer's guides are really extensive. Although, I go to other sites for my actual gaming news because I am not a fan of editorialized content which is what The Gamer seems to focus on much of the time.
Justin
Writers with agendas. Sick of seeing "writers" with agenders attacking people for having opinions different to theirs, and calling them bigots. They make it very clear that they are not happy about others opinions on a game but cant leave it there. They then start their own attack. Singling out individuals and commenting on there appearance and nationality. I'm not on the side of anyone having a rant about political aspects being forced into a game. But I'm certainly not on the side of writers such those on the gamer who should think twice before labeling someone "a bald British man" I wonder how you would feel if that bald British man started commenting on your appearance and nationality? What does an individuals comments have to do with them being bald or British? Or are you suggesting anyone bald and British must share their opinion and be a "bigot"? Not everyone who doesn't want to place a label on themselves and start using pronouns is a bigot. And not everyone who doesn't want to use pronouns is against others using them. Perhaps the issue here is players who have bought a game being forced into using pronouns on the game? Perhaps an option to use them or not use them could be a simple option. Would improve the site greatly if you did not generalise and make assumptions about people who look differently to you.
Vincenzo S.
Plenty of activist, and high bias political content of their review. Absolutly unprofessional, the same people write bad review ( or good one ) are the very same than are gay, transgender, lgbt etc. And guess why they write bad or good review? Absolutley avoid this garbage.