Temi.comReviews of temi.com

Have had a few transcripts here, and the accuracy ratio for these files was not what I expected. Submitted some audio that was clear and understandable, and transcript came back totally unreadable. I had to make many edits to it, and I could have transcribed it myself faster than it took me to edit the one produced by this automated robot. You get what you paid for, but I would not waste my money on this company.

I wanted to give them a try as it was a free offer from Rev.com. Then the price to pay was dirt cheap. The file was really bad that was returned to me in 5 minutes but I spent 20 minutes editing. Would I try again? Yes. I mean for the price I get a basic transcript for Youtube which did not need to be perfect.

Missed or wrongly transcribed words and names numerous times. Speaker ID is complete garbage, had to manually fix these hundreds of times on a 30min file. The amount of time for me to correct the file, I could just transcribe it by hand and do it faster. Doesn't do BiTC or account for timecode breaks so that's a manual fix that takes forever. Honestly, they should drop their rates to be in line with Amazon transcribe since it's garage in and garbage out. The editor tool is the only thing that saved them from being a one star.

Unusable -- though, at times, hilarious. An interview, with me sitting next to the single subject in a quiet boardroom, no one else around and no background noise of any kind. She's well-spoken and the clarity of the recording is top-notch, recorded on a professional digital device with a great, balanced mic, and yet the transcript was a garbled mess of odd phrases and utter madness. As others have written, a waste of time. Two stars because at least they're trying. Looks like this tech has some ways to go, and in my opinion it should stay in [free] beta for a while yet.

I found that the first one was great followed what the voices had said but I have now done an additional 4 and they have been more work for me as they have not been very accurate at all. The last one I could not even use at all it was very far from the voices. I may not use the service if it is not at least 60% accurate. It takes too much to redo it.

i would actually put the rating at 2.5 stars right now. The idea is great and the delivery is excellent. multiple speakers is a real challenege here

Extremely inaccurate

So far the transcripts are too erroneous to be useful. "Speaker" delineation seems to follow a pause rather than voice.