Rockefeller Tax ProsReviews of rockefellertaxpros.com

Response from Rockefeller Tax ProsOct 22, 2026

Mr. McNelley, For clarification, Don Rockefeller is my father and operates a completely separate and independent tax practice. He is not affiliated with Rockefeller Tax Pros. What you could not have known when publishing your review is that my father experienced a serious personal emergency shortly before the October 15 tax filing deadline, rendering him unable to respond to telephone calls during that period. His inability to return your calls was the result of circumstances entirely beyond his control, not a reflection of his professionalism or integrity. As for Rockefeller Tax Pros, I have personally reviewed our telephone records, missed calls, voicemail messages, and email correspondence. I have found absolutely no record of any communication from you. You acknowledge that you have never been a client of this firm, yet you have publicly characterized me as a dishonest tax preparer despite having never engaged my professional services or, based on the records available, even contacted my office. Unfortunately, based on my previous experiences with Trustpilot, I have little confidence that the platform will take meaningful action to address a review containing misleading allegations, even when factual discrepancies are brought to its attention. Therefore, since Trustpilot is unlikely to intervene, perhaps you will consider preserving your own integrity by correcting your review to accurately reflect the facts. As for your statement that you are no longer interested in becoming a client of Rockefeller Tax Pros, I can assure you that the sentiment is mutual. I wish you success in finding a tax professional better suited to your needs.

Response from Rockefeller Tax ProsOct 22, 2026

Thank you Danielle, it is a pleasure to work with you!

Response from Rockefeller Tax ProsJun 19, 2025

Response from Rockefeller Tax Pros Steve Dang engaged Rockefeller Tax Pros on April 15, 2024—the same day his personal income tax return was due. As a courtesy, we prepared and filed a tax extension and subsequently completed his return within two business days of receiving his final documents. The completed return resulted in a substantial five-figure tax savings. After reviewing the results, Mr. Dang questioned the accuracy of the return, stating he believed he had a $3,000–$5,000 capital loss carryover. We reviewed his 2022 filings and confirmed no such carryover existed. This was communicated to Mr. Dang, who could not provide documentation to support his claim. After clarification and a final review of his Schedule C expenses, he approved the return for filing and signed the IRS authorization under penalty of perjury, affirming the return was “true, correct, and complete.” Months after filing, Mr. Dang raised additional concerns, suggesting that his income should have been reported through an S corporation. However, all income was issued to him personally—via W-2 and 1099 forms under his name and Social Security number—not to any business entity. Despite repeated requests, Mr. Dang was unable to provide documentation for the S corporation or any other business entity he referenced. At no time was our firm engaged to prepare or file business entity returns. To clarify: the only service rendered and paid for was the preparation and filing of Mr. Dang’s personal 1040 return, which was completed accurately and in a timely manner based on the documents he provided. Mr. Dang’s concerns appear to stem from misunderstandings about tax law and filing requirements—not from any inaccuracy or oversight on our part. After completing the tax returns for which he hired us, Mr. Dang repeatedly sought extensive guidance on matters far beyond the scope of the original engagement—always without compensation. These unscheduled calls and messages frequently lasted 30 minutes to over an hour and occurred during evenings, weekends, and even holidays. He also texted referencing our social media activity to imply we were “available” and should respond immediately. Most recently, in March 2025—just one day before the March 15 filing deadline—Mr. Dang reached out to ask whether his S corporation returns had been completed and whether they would be filed on time. However, he had never engaged our firm to prepare those returns. In fact, prior to that, he stated he was still deciding whether to hire us for that work. Given that he was not a retained client for business tax filings, and with multiple confirmed clients requiring attention ahead of the deadline, we did not respond. Coincidentally—or not—his one-star review was submitted shortly thereafter. Our lack of ongoing response was not neglect—it was a boundary. His demands were unreasonable and unsustainable, particularly given that he had not retained us for continued strategic services or advisory work. We take pride in delivering prompt, professional service, and we respect our clients’ time—as well as our own. We stand by the accuracy of our work, the boundaries we set, and the standards we uphold. — Rockefeller Tax Pros

Response from Rockefeller Tax ProsMar 14, 2025

Thank you Jessie, it was a pleasure working with you.

Response from Rockefeller Tax ProsMar 14, 2025

Thank you Monica, I'm happy you were pleased with the results. It was a pleasure working with you.

Response from Rockefeller Tax ProsApr 19, 2024

Thank you so much Jennifer! It was a pleasure working with you 😊

Response from Rockefeller Tax ProsApr 16, 2024

Thank you very much Jeremy! Thank you for allowing me to prepare your taxes again. 😊