Kittee S.
Hazel is very dedicated to her work.
Hazel is very dedicated to her work.

"We are innovators and we craft smart digital and design solutions which promises to contribute to our client’s success."
Logoprofz (logoprofz.com) has 39 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 4.0 out of 5.
Is this your business?
Correct your details and reply to customers in public. Both are free.
Claim this listing39 approved reviews, newest moderated first
Kittee S.
Hazel is very dedicated to her work.
Linda H.
Hazel did two Logos for me and I love them both. Besides that, she has the patience of a saint. Brent is now working on a website for me. He’s a pleasure to work with as well. This is my first website and we’ve even laughed over it.
Rene V.
Hazel was the best!
Bart G.
She was very attentive when I told her what my thoughts were but also what I wanted their input to be. Listened to changes I wanted and made it happen.
House for Rent In F.
Prospective english first language customers, read the positive reviews. One can tell a lot from those. Pay full attention to the negative reviews.
MARIO
It was a very professional attention, a very friendly woman name Hazel attended me and she was very kind, she understood perfectly what i Needed. Very Happy with the service.
Krutar P.
The beginning process for Logoprofz was a bit rough. After a rough conversation with their legal department and them taking things I said out of context Hazel contacted me about my work. She restored my trust in Logoprofz and was very professional and courteous to my needs and past experiences. She didn’t hassle me at all about anything. She did kindly explain the copyright section of their logo and I kindly declined it and she was very professional and respectful about my decision. If I could give 10 stars I would definitely give 10 to Hazel Conner!
Hal E.
The group designing my logo did a great job. Unfortunately, the Logoprofz legal department ruined everything! Jonathan Victor, a paralegal at Logoprofz attempted to get me to pay for legal services by providing false information. He stated that some other company applied for the same trademark name on January 6, 2023 that I applied for on October 11, 2022 and stated that I needed my application to include an attorney. I checked with USPTO and the only applicants required to have an attorney are companies outside the continental US. Jonathan also said the IRS and some other entity needed to review my application and if they don't, USPTO would reject my application. I contacted USPTO and they said the IRS has no involvement whatsoever in USPTO matters. The USPTO stated that this was a red flag solicitation attempt and that I should cease all communication with Jonathan Victor. I will also be providing this review on Yelp which has only four reviews... all one (1) star reviews.