Monster for EmployersReviews of hiring.monster.com

I got maybe one applicant and it was garbage.

Was so easy to use. Received great resumes. Will definitely use again.

The website is easy to use, but the cost for posting is a little too much just for the chance of finding an suitable employee.

We received absolutely no candidates from Monster. Essentially it was a waste of money. Unfortunately Monster does not work in rural areas such as Bigfork, MN.

For whatever reason, applicants do not bother including a cover letter even when the job posting clearly states that a cover letter is required to be considered for the position.

We were seeking a preschool teacher for a part time, relatively low wage position. Although many people viewed our posting, we received no qualified candidates and less than 10 resumes. We selected a short term contract with Monster, not realizing that we had to pay an additional fee to search and view resumes. Monster was not worth the cost for our organization. Indeed worked much better for us and supplied more candidates, albeit most were not qualified. We filled the position with a candidate from Indeed.

The process was painless and very intuitive. Training was not needed. Thanks,

We paid quite a lot to run this ad for 30 days, and we have only received 12 applicants so far (about three weeks in). All 12 didn't have one single qualification we had listed or described.