GoatfundedReviews of goatfunded.com

I am very disappointed with the recurring technical issues I have experienced with Match-Trader at Goat Funded Trader. On October 13, 2026, I was managing an open trade and tried to secure my position, but Match-Trader executed the opposite action and would not allow me to make the changes I needed. As a result, my Stop Loss was hit, and I suffered a loss. I contacted support, explained the situation, and thankfully, they refunded my loss. However, on October 14, 2026, I experienced another technical issue with Match-Trader, even though I had no open trades this time. This makes me seriously concerned about the platform's reliability. I also did not receive any advance notification about maintenance or technical problems. I requested to switch my account to MT5, but I was told this was not possible because I had already placed my first trade. My question is simple: How am I supposed to trade confidently if the platform keeps malfunctioning whenever I need it? Do other traders experience the same issue, or am I the only one facing this problem? I appreciate that the support team responded quickly and refunded my previous loss. However, repeated technical issues and the lack of advance notifications make it difficult to trust the platform. I hope Goat Funded Trader takes this issue seriously, investigates the recurring Match-Trader problems, and provides a permanent solution, such as allowing affected traders to switch to MT5. Traders deserve a reliable platform that allows them to manage their positions properly and trade with confidence.

This prop firm company’s rules are designed to get you stuck, or possibly make you fail. Stay away from them.

the worst company ever

Title: Unprofessional Support Experience and Unclear Multi-Tiered Fee Structure I am writing this review to share my objective and honest experience with Goat Funded Trader, supported by full account transaction records and chat transcripts. 1. Repetitive and Unhelpful Customer Support The customer service experience has been extremely frustrating and inefficient. Support agents consistently fail to read previous conversation histories or check account logs. Instead of addressing straightforward questions about active accounts or platform mechanisms, agents repeatedly send automated or copy-pasted responses asking to restate the issue, before abruptly closing the chat ticket due to inactivity. I had to go through identical repetitive loops over multiple days without receiving clear, direct assistance. 2. Complex and Multiple Payment Requirements to Access Payouts Prospective clients should be fully aware of the payment mechanics involved before starting a challenge. Passing an initial phase is not the end of the required fees. To progress through evaluation stages (such as Pay Later challenges) and ultimately obtain an account eligible for profit withdrawals, users must pay initial fees, secondary transition/reset fees where applicable, and a separate "Activation Fee" ($118 in my order history) just to receive the live funded account. These are my bad experiences with this company. I highly do not recommend them to anyone. You have been warned.

I strongly disagree with this response. You keep repeating the allegation of coordinated trading, but I have clearly stated that I traded independently using my own ICT analysis and never copied anyone else's trades or shared trading signals. You provided an Excel spreadsheet containing trades from other accounts whose owners I do not know. Similar trading times do not, by themselves, establish that I coordinated trades with those traders. I also noticed differences in lot sizes and execution times in the report. You have now rejected my appeal and declared the decision final, but I still do not feel that my concerns have been properly addressed. My expected payout of approximately $4000 was rejected, and my $200,000 account was breached based on an allegation I strongly dispute. I have also seen other customers publicly describing similar experiences involving account breaches and rejected payouts. This raises serious concerns for me about the transparency of your payout review process. I am asking GFT to provide a clear, evidence-based explanation rather than simply repeating its original conclusion. I know how I traded, and I stand by my statement that my trading decisions were my own. To other traders: if you have experienced a similar situation with GFT, please share your genuine experience and explain how your case was handled. Other traders deserve to make informed decisions based on honest customer feedback. My complaint has also been submitted to Prop Firm Match for further review. I will update my review if there is a meaningful development. I cannot recommend GFT based on my experience.

I had an eligible and pending withdrawal of $500 on my funded account, fully compliant with consistency guidelines. On October 14, 2026, my account was suddenly marked breached due to a trade recorded at 7:15 PM IST. ​I never placed, opened, or authorized this trade. My MT5 application was completely closed, and prior to this event, my account was completely idle with zero open positions and my balance remained safely at $5,348 (above the daily limit threshold of $5,337). ​Immediately after this unauthorized execution, my MT5 login access was disabled so I could not access logs myself. When contacting support, they simply dismissed my claim with generic boilerplate responses saying "trades can only be executed on your end" without providing any server audit proof. ​I specifically requested the server connection log—the IP address and device header that sent the order to their MT5 server at 7:15 PM IST—and they refused to provide technical verification while holding my legitimate $500 payout. ​Phantom trades triggering breaches right before a scheduled payout, coupled with a refusal to provide server execution logs, is completely unacceptable. I demand senior management review the server logs for Account ID [315278230] and resolve this matter. UPDATE (Oct 16, 2026): It has now been over 24 hours since the formal technical dispute was submitted to riskteam@goatfundedtrader (Account 315278230). The firm continues to remain silent and refuses to provide server connection logs/IP audits for the phantom 7:15 PM IST execution, while holding $500 in accrued profit. Still awaiting accountability and technical transparency. Thank you for the acknowledgment. I appreciate that you agree account decisions must be supported by accurate records. ​My formal dispute for Account 315278230 has already been sent to riskteam@goatfundedtrader. from my registered email (rvs1250@gmail.). I am specifically waiting for the MT5 server audit log for the October 14, 7:15 PM IST execution (specifically showing the originating connection IP and client terminal header). ​Once the Risk Team verifies that this order did not originate from my personal terminal and restores my account/eligible $500 profit, I will happily update this review accordingly. UPDATE (Oct 22, 2026 - Firm Refusing Technical Logs): After publicly claiming they review cases based on "accurate trading data," support agent Mike responded with an unreadable dashboard metric snippet rather than the requested technical logs. ​The firm continues to evade providing the MT5 server connection IP and terminal header for the unauthorized 7:15 PM IST execution that breached Account 315278230 and wiped out $500 in accrued profits. Hiding server logs while blaming the trader confirms the lack of operational integrity. Case remains fully disputed.

Scam Propfirm Do not waste your money

I have had several accounts with Goat funded and had 1 funded. My last account, which I bought 2 weeks ago suddenly closed an open (would have been) profitable trade last week when it was in a floating loss. I checked to see what happened only to see a mail stating that I had reached my max daily drawdown on the account #315261162. I knew of course that I had not. Apparently, a loss I had taken days before was counted as a loss for that day. I escalated the issue to their customer care and after giving silly general responses, one was bold enough to admit the system really had issues. Upon further escalation, one said daily drawdown does not count for just that day and even said it did not matter if the loss was taken 10 days ago. He could just admit that htey had intentionally set the counting to breach my account than say such. He clearly did not know the difference between daily drawdown and max drawdown. Anyways, after plenty evidence that they had a wrong calculation, they still did nothing about it, knowing fully well it was a wrong call. I dont even think it really is the customer care not wanting to do anything about it, even though they themselves dont really know hwhat they are doing a lot of times. The first guy I talked to just kept giving me answers provided by Ai, until I called him out for like the tenth time in the conversation. I think they know there system could calculate wrongly or theyve deliberately set it to be so. Either ways, it is evil.