Internet ArchiveReviews of archive.org

What is required to be able to archive more links to the Wayback Machine? I sent to the company but you can't archive more websites per day because it overloads the servers, and today I could only archive 4 today and then get a message: You have reached your daily bandwidth limit. Please email us at "info @ archive.org" if you would like to discuss this more." But there's no point in sending to them then and discussing this and knowing that I could archive more before per day. You don't have time to save that much of a page before the page is shut down. The year is 2026 but the website is still overloaded and it's unsustainable that you can't archive more than 4 URLs per day.

When contacting staff regarding a problem they appear to deliberately misunderstand a query or simply don't understand it. this is despite explaining it several times. The website itself is great, but don't waste your time trying to get any semblance of understanding or help from their staff.

It's not bad, but it's prolonged. The primary issue with this site is its performance. No matter how stable your internet speed is, it takes forever to load a page you want to browse. The biggest problem with this site is that it struggles to load statuses on Twitter, and when it's full of pictures or videos, it gets stuck or displays broken thumbnails. It requires a lot of effort to make it functional because, in its current form, it's a far cry from what it should be.

Some years ago I would have given Archive.org 4 or even 5 stars, but at this time I can't even recommend it anymore. Even if one is lucky enough to find this site under an occasional victorious uptime, one won't be able to continue working as it will go down within minutes or even seconds and stay down for a long time coming up for a minute or two and before you finish entering one single URL into the Wayback Machine, it will be down again. What is the most upsetting that I have donated money to the WB Internet Archive and the owner of the Archive.org wrote that I was one of the few who was donating money to WB. I donated for the god job it was doing, with a rare occasional downtime, it was still reasonable to use it. Not anymore. When WB went into almost continuous downtime for days and weeks etc. I stopped donating. The money request pop ups also stopped lately. Perhaps because they are in trouble or are shutting down its operation? Perhaps they are unable to finance their operation anymore or perhaps the almost continuous downtime is even allegedly intentional (though unlikely), especially to those who did not donate "enough", I don't know. But as it seems Archive.org is probably going down and will probably close ts doors soon. I hope I am wrong. If WB is unable to finance their operation anymore they should make it a paid service for a small monthly fee such as $1 to $3 a month so that everyone can afford it. Otherwise it's such a waste of time and resources to have an Archive that is unusable anymore. I need to record my URLs and docs somewhere and I will not be coming back to or relying on Archive.org Wayback Machine anymore. We need to find a serious alternative to Archive.org or the so-called globalists have to create one from UN funds or something like that, cause it is a very important service. Two stars (instead of one) because it was useful in the past.

WOW! After getting a few million dollars from donations, you limit the request rate , great! This was a 10/10 service, but i hope it does not go to downhill....