Tom's GuideReviews of tomsguide.com

Clearly don't know what they are talking about, read a review about Galaxy Buds 3 Pro compare to 2 Pro (which I own) and the review was a load of crap. Apparently the Buds 3 Pro have IPX57 rating🤨 it's little details cos what they have is IP57 but IPX7 is totally a different thing while IPX57 is not even a thing. Also the cons seem like decided by the writer themselves, longer battery life than airpods yet "disappointing battery life" while airpods have "great battery life"? Load of crap there

Best things ever how do people don’t like that theg totally don’t sponsor they reviews and they totally don’t hold me at a gunpoint when i type this

They are stuck in the past!!!!! Someone else can have a username meaning they are awesome at doing a certain "numbered" sexual position, but I am unable to have 420 in my name alongside my favourite comic book villain because it is "illegal". Someone else in their Tom's Hardware site had 420 in their name with the word "records" beside it, and was allowed to KEEP their name no questions asked. My need for help was not met, clarity not given, and treated like a child because they do not know how to handle mental health issues. They also changed my username WITHOUT my authorization while I was sleeping.

Article title "Best OLED TV" Number four on the list is Sony which the author states; " best tv of the bunch, but costs to much." So the Article should be titled, OLED TV Rated by price. W O W !

ads instead of reviews

They seem to hire freelance writers who may have little or no experience in the topic. For example, recently they published a very click bait feature "I tried charging an EV at home and it was a shock I wasn't expecting". The writer was talking about his experience using level 1 charging on an EV, and how after driving the car for several days to run the battery down. He was shocked that level one couldn't recharge it completely overnight. The capabilities of level 1, level two, and level three charging have been in the news more or less continuously for the last several years. If he was shocked, it's because he lives with his head in a hole in the ground. It's very disappointing. Tom's guide obviously has some kind of axe to grind or they simply do not care.

Site très désagréable. J'ai un texte "stupide" à chaque fois que je copies/colle un élément du site. C'est surement une sécurité débile qui n’empêchera jamais une copie mise en ligne ou un plagiat mais qui emmerdera l'utilisateur. Sur ce dernier point c'est réussi. Je n'y reviendrais pas.

Completely bias towards Apple at all times. Hard to make an educated purchase decision when Tom calls the same feature a pro for one device and a con for the other. Complete drivel. They must me paid off by apple.