The Conversation USReviews of theconversation.com

C’est mignon et fait pour les bobos. À ne pas commenter de façon critique si vous ne voulez pas voir votre commentaire être supprimé. Au début ça me semblait présenter un intérêt mais, rapidement j’ai pu changer d’avis grâce à la modération. Moralité : tous les mails vont directement dans les spams.

the conversation.com france est un tissus de mensonge soumis à la docsa; c'est un de ses lave mains

You can't refute what so haughty academics write, including fact checking doctors "results," and assuredness in their prescribing and diagnosis'.

One of the worst rage bait, lying news outlets. Can't even be bothered to to check basic facts then proceed to make sensationalist articles, that mean nothing because they can't do their homework. They delete comments calling them out or calling out irregularities in the article.

Not accurate news and a waste of my data

Another site that claims to be an independent news source while being funded by government agencies and praising fact-checkers. Their articles full of rhetoric and no data. They talk about echo chambers while being a pin-striped echo chamber themselves. ------ Update, after writing comments to one article, I can´t comment on articles that others can comment on. I just wanted to fact check their fact checking of the fact checkers by saying what was apparently too much for them: Did it every occur to you that fact checkers might not fully grasp the content that they are fact checking? Like when they are fact checking the Babylon Bee? Do you really believe that the fact checkers have experts in all fields of different observations? Did it even occur to you that some fact checkers like News Guard are highly political and sponsored by organizations like Department of Defense and the State Department? Did it further not occur to you that there are some discussions that can go on without facts being settled? Like in science? That fact checkers might kill the possibility of getting closer to the truth, because they shut down the discussion? Where is your journalistic scepticism here? You just assume that fact checkers get it right and aren’t manipulated, inspite of being financed by big industry and government? Did your “indpendent” scepticism suffer under the government grants you get yourself?

They speak about disinformation, but all they do is carrying elites propaganda. What a joke !

Propagande, mensonges...