Elma P.
An easy to use and affordable AI…
An easy to use and affordable AI writer. But support is non-existent, even with the intervention of Appsumo.

Get Professional Level Articles in Seconds. Market leading AI copywriting tool.AI-powered article writer and 30+ content generation tools will help you to produce a long form content for your blog, website, social media, and more
Texta.ai (texta.ai) has 360 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 4.4 out of 5.
Is this your business?
Correct your details and reply to customers in public. Both are free.
Claim this listingShowing 19 reviews with 3 stars · Clear filters
Elma P.
An easy to use and affordable AI writer. But support is non-existent, even with the intervention of Appsumo.
Terrance W.
Texta.ai is useful for people who need short pieces of writing like titles, social media posts, and meta descriptions. While the concept of creating entire articles with little effort is attractive, the tool only generates average long-form content. The output quality depends on the input quality, and Texta.ai has limited input text. I achieve better outcomes by utilizing ChatGPT, even though it necessitates more effort to provide the tool with a brief.
Bryan T.
The requirements to upgrade are frankly beginning to be irritating.
Wanderlust
While Texta looks promising, it still has some ways to go in the form of article quality. I like that it produces written content quickly; however, most of it is unrelated or needs extensive editing to be usable. Hopeful that it will get better in the future.
Jack from C.
I purchased the Life Time Deal from AppSumo in January 2022 and was psyched to try it out. The very first article I tried to produce (as a test) was about the increase in antisemitism in Canada. The generated article started out quite promising, offering insights and statistics of antisemitic events. But then, in the middle of the article, the tone turned around and the article itself started becoming antisemitic in nature. In addition, the links it provided in support of the statistics were completely bogus (nonsensical). This left me quite unimpressed and I didn't use it again for quite some time. Then, I had occasion to meet with a client last July who had a website (related to Cannibis use) and wanted to generate blog content. I showed him my copy of texta.ai and used it to generate a candidate blog entry. He was very impressed. So, I guess it would depend on the area of focus and the amount of data available during the training period. In conclusion, for my needs, I wasn't prepared to put in the effort to thoroughly check the output of generated content for the original version, but with GPT-4 being a more powerful version, and with access to more up-to-date internet data, I am looking forward to trying again with the latest iteration.
Deb B.
Easy to use, but I hope the outputs improve with the use of GPT4.
Twobad
It's an okay tool to use using AI
Rakesh
Good tool but lacks analysis part