Ernest S. G.
Client Account#: 15127835
Client Account#: 15127835 Business Complaint – Service and Billing Practices I enrolled in a monthly pest control service with Terminix. Despite this, service was not provided automatically. I was repeatedly informed that a technician would only be dispatched if I called when pest activity was severe, which is inconsistent with a monthly service agreement. When service was requested, the technician appeared rushed and visibly frustrated, expressing annoyance that the visit had been scheduled. The quality of service was poor and did not meet reasonable expectations. After several months, my wife contacted Terminix to cancel the service. No further service visits occurred after October. However, in January, I received a $114 bill that had been sent to collections, despite no services being rendered during the intervening months. Upon contacting Terminix, I was informed that the cancellation was allegedly invalid because there were no internal notes documenting it. I was further told I was responsible for charges for months following the last service visit, even though no service was performed. Terminix stated that the local branch declined the dispute and demanded payment, offering no resolution. Customer service representatives were unprofessional and dismissive, particularly when discussing cancellation. It was evident that representatives were following a retention script designed to resist cancellations rather than resolve customer concerns. I am disputing the charges for services not provided and object to the account being sent to collections without proper verification. Terminix’s billing and cancellation practices appear misleading and unfair, placing the burden on the customer when internal documentation is incomplete.



