Ponion S.
They helped me with any problems I had
They helped me with any problems I had. Good fills and easy UI.

Strix Options Funding is a proprietary trading evaluation firm that helps options traders gain access to funded trading capital. Our goal is simple: give traders the opportunity to prove their ability and trade larger accounts without needing large personal capital. Traders begin by completing a structured evaluation where they demonstrate consistent performance and responsible risk management. Once the requirements are met, traders can qualify for funded accounts and earn payouts based on their results. We focus specifically on options trading and aim to provide a fair and flexible environment. Traders are free to use their own strategies and trading styles, including holding positions overnight when their strategy requires it. Our rules are designed to support disciplined trading while still giving traders the flexibility they need to perform.Strix Options partners with RixTrade, a modern trading platform built for options traders. The platform is simple to use, fast, and designed to make executing and managing trades straightforward.Transparency is a core principle of our company. We do not charge hidden fees, and traders do not pay an activation fee upfront. Instead, the activation fee is only deducted from the first payout once a trader becomes funded. Our mission is to provide serious traders with a clear, fair, and professional path to accessing real trading capital.
Strix Options Funding (strixoptionsfunding.com) has 120 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 4.6 out of 5.
Is this your business?
Correct your details and reply to customers in public. Both are free.
Claim this listing
Investments & Wealth · NEW YORK, New York
Excellent

Investments & Wealth · Seal Beach, California
Excellent

Investments & Wealth · New York, New York
Excellent

Investments & Wealth · Conyers, Georgia
Excellent
120 approved reviews, newest moderated first
Ponion S.
They helped me with any problems I had. Good fills and easy UI.
LIC
First time experiencing this prop firm and they are great.
Evan F.
Massive issues with ticksage. Since moving to Rix has been better but still get pretty bad fills compared to Webull. Aiden has been good to deal with only reason why they get one star but I would Avoid until the kinks are worked out.
Response from Strix Options FundingMay 29, 2026
Thank you for your feedback, Evan. We're sorry to hear your experience wasn't what you hoped for. We'd like to clarify that all trades are executed as market orders, which fill at the prevailing market price by design - platform comparisons in this context are not valid. With respect to risk management, our evaluation program has clear guidelines around position sizing, and we hold all traders to those standards consistently. Demonstrating disciplined risk management is a core requirement of our program - not optional. We genuinely wish you well in your trading journey. - The Strix Options Team
sid G.
“Astrid”/RixTrade … Strix platform for options, is scoring drawdown off theoretical mark value and widened spreads, yet refusing to execute resting limit orders sitting ABOVE the exact prices they’re valuing the positions at. That disconnect is the issue. If the platform says my position is worth X for drawdown purposes, but simultaneously won’t allow an actual fill anywhere near that valuation, then the account is being judged on synthetic losses rather than executable market reality. Example: I had PATH 5/22 $9.50/$11 long strangles open. The system was marking the position aggressively against me for drawdown, while: * buy orders above current quoted values remained pending * fills were inconsistent * the spread/mark appeared disconnected from executable liquidity If the platform claims a contract is worth $0.30-$0.35 for drawdown calculations, but orders at or above those prices are not getting filled, then that valuation is not reflecting true market execution. That matters because in prop trading, liquidation thresholds are everything. A realistic risk model should be based on: * executable fills * realistic liquidity * actual marketable pricing —not inflated theoretical marks that traders cannot transact at. What makes this even more frustrating is these were LONG STRANGLES. Defined-risk positions. Not naked exposure. The strategy itself was structured specifically to manage directional uncertainty and volatility expansion. Several legs were near or in-the-money while the account was still being penalized as if the positions were worthless. The biggest concern here isn’t even the loss itself. It’s the precedent: If accounts can fail from non-executable mark pricing while real orders remain unfilled, traders are effectively being liquidated by simulated valuation mechanics rather than tradable market conditions. That’s not how real execution works. Also worth noting: I previously contacted Strix regarding a separate account breach that I believe was unfairly triggered. I provided proof showing the underlying contracts would have recovered and passed the evaluation within the same week. I’m not asking for favors or special treatment — all I’ve wanted from the beginning is transparency and a fair opportunity.
Christian
The staff are extremely nice and quick to help with any issues or concerns. 10/10 service
Moe
I have been using Strix for a month now and the platform is working great. They are very quick to respond to inquiries and fix any bugs. I am planning to buy 2 new accounts and copy trade in the next week or so. No other service like it out there.
Simon J.
Great firm, excited to work with them. Cheers
TheNQKidd
Had a great experience with Strix so far, great program I've seen others excel in and I'm excited to trade further with them!