Snopes.comReviews of snopes.com

Snopes used to be good. But something happened. Can't they find good fact checkers anymore? Are the so overly cautious that they can't make a decision any longer. Their new tagline should be, "We Can Neither Confirm, Nor Deny". They are worse than the CIA now. Major newspapers report something but Snopes can't verify anything, unless it's an obvious parody. Honestly, don't bother with them any more. It's just too frustrating these days.

Used to be my go to for fact checking but you have to pay to read anything.

Started out promising but has turned into a propaganda site that tries to cover up real events.

The fact checking system is, by logical and judicial standards, ineffective in checking the facts that is issuing judgement in regards to; hence, acting as a passive apparatus of disseminating public information that is seen as a threat to the current status quo. Their Terms and Conditions, and as well the manner of processing the fact checking cases, indicates deep bias in regards to the true validity information that is processed, implying a lack of efficiency in attaining its declared purpose. This system has issued conclusions based on the declarations of incriminated parties, without actually judging the matter separately or seeking alternative possibilities of validating different potential conclusions.

The proof is in how they dealt with Covid and the Hunter Biden laptop "conspiracy theory" that the left-wing media mislead people with and how they heavily censored the content, among other things. I'm 100% convinced without a shadow of a doubt that they are having their strings pulled by the powers that be with their "fact checkers" label that they falsely claim. That term is so overused anyway it longer means anything thanks to corrupt organizations like this.

Facts are checked using media headlines and they all project a certain narrative. To get a clear picture of how corrupt and biased the so-called staff, search for "The Death of Fact Checkers" by Upper Echelon on YouTube.

some of it's biases are: it insists everything paranormal and supernatural aren't real(when they're explained as something other than mundane hoaxes) regardless of their authenticity and they're make Big Tech's fact-checkers can't have Alien invasion as next 9/11 for "taking away realism" among others

During the scamdemic my friend posted videos everything was factual. They said it was all nonsense. Terrible organisation. My friend even reached out to show them and was in contact with other journalists who behaved similarly. No integrity whatso ever snopes