Aref M.
I had a very concerning experience with…
I had a very concerning experience with a website called ScamMinder, operated by Mohammad Jorjandi. Our website was given a score of 10/100, and after that we were contacted and asked to pay £60 so that our website could be “re-analyzed” and the score reconsidered. It was implied that without payment, the negative labeling would remain. This raises serious ethical concerns. Asking for money in exchange for re-evaluating or improving a negative assessment does not feel transparent or trustworthy, especially for a platform that claims to protect people from scams. In my opinion, trust and credibility should never be tied to payment. Users and businesses should be very cautious and do their own research before relying on such ratings.
Response from ScamminderOct 2, 2026
Hi Aref, thank you for raising this. We take it seriously. Our policy is clear and public: no paid service changes a ScamMinder score or verdict, and disputing a result is always free (scamminder.com/dispute). If you received a message asking for payment to re-analyze or change your score, please forward it to us via scamminder.com/contact so we can investigate. We'd also be glad to re-run a full analysis of your site free of charge. Just let us know the domain. - ScamMinder Team


