Official SAAFE.infoReviews of saafe.info

This forum has so much potential and could genuinely be a great safe space for women in the industry to talk, make friends and share information. Unfortunately, the moderation completely lets it down. The moderator, Amy, is rude and passive-aggressive and acts as though she’s the only person in the industry who knows anything about it. She nitpicks and micromanages posts, particularly from new members who obviously aren’t going to know exactly how everything works straight away. Rather than simply explaining something they’ve missed, they often get a paragraph of rudeness about it. At the same time, genuinely rude and judgemental behaviour from other members doesn’t seem to get the same attention. I’ve seen people share bad experiences and receive replies with absolutely no sympathy, and others ask for advice offering additional services only to be met with condescending comments and people basically telling them their ideas won’t work. If posts are going to be moderated this heavily, surely the focus should be on stopping members from putting others down or gatekeeping rather than nitpicking how somebody has made a post. People also can’t seem to talk freely. Strippers are restricted to posting about certain things within the stripping section, and even if you check for an existing thread before posting, a vaguely similar thread from six or seven years ago can result in your new one being merged into it. At that point it feels less like organising a forum and more like making it unnecessarily difficult to have a current conversation. The new-member system feels backwards too. You can’t use PMs until you’ve made a few “valuable” posts, yet you don’t have to link your profile/AD or go through any real verification to prove you’re actually a sex worker. Anyone could post rubbish until they gain PM access anyway. Surely properly verifying members would be more useful, especially for people who have joined specifically to connect with others in the industry. Some of the safety rules don’t make much sense either. You can’t discuss UK Punting despite punter reviews affecting women, and the section for reporting badly behaved clients is public rather than restricted to verified members. This means you can’t share significant identifying information such as full names or number plates, and you can’t even include the last two digits of a phone number. Numbers and AdultWork usernames can easily be changed, so a private area for properly verified sex workers to share useful safety information would make far more sense. It’s a shame because the idea behind the forum is genuinely good. It could be a brilliant community for women in the industry, but instead it feels overly controlled in areas that don’t matter while behaviour that actually makes people feel unwelcome is allowed. Running a forum doesn’t make someone the authority on an entire industry, and people should be able to have normal conversations without every post being micromanaged.

Saafe is a very biased forum and i feel i have to be honest it has got far worse. It should be for advice and safety for sex workers as a priority but it is controlled by a moderator who is extremely far left and very woke and this clouds her judgement. This individual gets offended over the smallest thing but happy to be very rude and passive aggressive to other members, so extreme opposites of behaviour going on here. A lot of these women on there including the main mod have boyfriends and husbands and the partners seem to be very comfortable with them doing this job so i feel women who are controlled by men or used will not be helped enough because too many members on there already have men taking advantage of them and they are blind to it. I dont think sex work should be celebrated on here as it comes across by many posters. It is a job that a lot of women do because they have little choice even though some are in denial to this. If a violent man has robbed and attacked women and the individual happens to be a black man if women want to avoid that type of man on the description for their own safety of not wanting to risk getting hurt or raped some accuse them of being racist just for trying to protect themselves of letting in the wrong man. This is inexcusable because every woman has a right to choose who she is intimate with and what risks she takes with her own body and the consequences mentally of these repercussions. There is some very unsavoury posters on saafe who put other women in danger. There is a woman SlaveForlove, i believe her other name is submissivewhorebbw on AWork who most posters seem to know about her as there is always drama from getting thrown out of hotels a lot or her daughters school finding out what her mum does because she has her face showing on X rate videos and telling people in her life what she does to make her money. She has told dangerous men they have a warning on a safety app and even sent screenshots to them so they are aware of what women have reported them and then he harasses those women. She advertises very rough and degrading services and allows customers to treat her like a rag doll. Too graphic and embarrassing to write the pacifics on here of what she allows. She has had many incidents where she has got injured by clients but she leaves out these details of why these men are doing this because these services are being advertised by her to be done to her. I have discussed this with many escort friends and we all think this makes it very easy for criminal men to NOT get held accountable and this behaviour that they are allowed to do they go on to other women thinking it is no big deal to behave this way !  If this was reported to the police unfortunately it would never get taken further because the CPS would not have much of a chance getting a result. She even opened the door to a man for a booking that put his hand over the spyhole so she could not see him and she let him in and he got rough and hurt her like he previously had done which she told everyone. This woman is a danger to herself and should not be working in this industry unfortunately though she is obsessed with earning as much as possible so her safety is not important as the money. I am in contact with a detective about something separate we speak from time to time and i have spoken to him about these type of situations and he said these women are not doing themselves any favours by advertising rough play and it would hinder a court case and probably never make it that far! Her husband is fully supportive of her work! She seems to be working most days and very late hours away and quite a distance from her home town. Make your own assumptions on this. The forum seems to dislike very much Client Eye probably because they have a huge following and earn money from their app and most prefer to do warnings on there instead of saafe. So many of us are constantly sick of the put downs by the moderator even criticising if a member of the app has reported someone for terrible disgusting hygiene. Well i am sorry that some of us escorts have a few morals and welcome reports of someone who clearly stinks and does not wash. It shows you have low expecatations and lack self worth if you think someone does not deserve a report for making a escort physically sick. Who wants them even using there bathroom to clean up if they are that bad some of us just want to avoid those men. The moderator picks on posters for the smallest thing and there seems to be a lot of passive aggressive behaviour and a nasty tone from the mods. I cannot recommend this forum with how it is run and the personal opinions coming into play with the owner. There is not many members left on this forum anymore. You do not need to guess why.

This forum is NOT serving it's actual… This forum is NOT serving it's actual purpose. Full of druggie lying con beaches. sweet honeys I visit they don't care about SAAFE. All lying, arrogant rude ugly money grabber b!tches post bullish!t warnings on SAAFE. There is not many just three posts about me from three beaches) p. It was one lying con b!tch who first started a thread on SAAFE just after I gave her a genuine negative review on UKP. Because this lying con was full of sh!t and refused to provide agreed service. My sweet honeys they always like me cause I am genuine and always nice to them. yummy yum yum yaba daba doo 😆😆😆😋😋😋 Javed my banning is unjustified. One lying hoe on SAAFE posted fake allegations against me. That beach is not even Indian an imposter hoe. It's pathetic SAAFE forum approved her fake story.

Not very helpful advice waste of time.

A forum, that half, is on public view, the other half isn't. Not a proper run forum in a million miles. The members, that use this forum, should look at it with open eyes and stop using it.

saafe is not safe

When I first discovered SAAFE I was appalled by the negativity from many of the escorts towards punters. However I think that does not reflect the majority of them. The bitter ones are more likely to post than those who are not in my opinion. I suspect they are bitter because, many of them have little choice or no choice at all but to be on the game and they resent that. Their attitude will inevitably become apparent to their clients who will shun them for better attitude girls. As a result the bitter escorts end up with clients that other girls will not see. As in any other service industry, worst providers beget bad clients and the whole thing then spirals. What worries me more is that SAAFE is supposed to be about Support and Advice. I fail to see how how anti punter rants fit into that description. The escort moderator on SAAFE are doing a worst job in my view. Worse still a lot of the questions on SAAFE come from new girls trying to get to grips with a demanding and challenging occupational choice that will impact their personal lives considerably and not just the bank balance. The harpies use this as a chance to try and inculcate the new girls with their own prejudices. Sad

Full of dodgy, malicious allegations against punters. I have been outed by an escort and that low life has given some fake defamatory statements about me and they approved her, pathetic.